首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


First proposal of quality indicators and standards and recommendations to improve the healthcare in the Spanish National Registry of Hip Fracture
Authors:Patricia Ysabel Condorhuamán-Alvarado  Teresa Pareja-Sierra  Angélica Muñoz-Pascual  Pilar Sáez-López  Cristina Ojeda-Thies  Teresa Alarcón-Alarcón  María Concepción Cassinello-Ogea  Jose Luis Pérez-Castrillón  Paloma Gómez-Campelo  Laura Navarro-Castellanos  Ángel Otero-Puime  Juan Ignacio González-Montalvo
Institution:1. Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain;2. Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain;3. Servicio de Geriatría, Hospital General de Segovia, Segovia, Spain;4. Unidad de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain;5. Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain;6. IdiPAZ Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain;7. Servicio de Anestesia, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain;8. Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain;9. Centro de Ciencias de la Salud San Rafael, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, Madrid, Spain;10. Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera, Madrid, Spain;11. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Abstract:BackgroundThe Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (or Registro Nacional de Fractura de Cadera, RNFC) is a database of hip fracture patients admitted to Spanish hospitals. Its goals include assessment and continuous improvement of the care process.ObjectivesTo (1) establish a series of indicators, (2) evaluate their initial fulfillment, (3) propose quality standards, (4) suggest recommendations to facilitate standards compliance, and (5) monitor the indicators.MethodThe indicators fulfilled the criteria of (1) evaluating the process or outcome, (2) being clinically relevant for patients, (3) being modifiable through changes in healthcare practice, and (4) being considered important by the RNFC participants. The first quartile obtained by the group of hospitals in each of the respective variables was proposed as the standard. The Indicators Advisory Committee (IAC) elaborated a list of recommendations for each indicator, based on the available evidence.ResultsSeven indicators were chosen. These indicators (its baseline compliance vs. the standard to be reached, respectively) were: the proportion of patients receiving surgery within 48 h (44% vs. 63%), mobilized the first postoperative day (56% vs. 86%), with antiosteoporotic medication at discharge (32% vs. 61%), with calcium supplements at discharge (46% vs. 77%), with vitamin D supplements at discharge (67% vs. 92%), who developed pressure ulcers during hospitalization (7.2% vs. 2.1%) and with independent mobility at 30 days (58% vs. 70%). The IAC has established 25 recommendations for improving care.ConclusionThe indicators and standards chosen are presented, as well as the list of recommendations. This process completes the first step to improve quality of care. The results will be evaluated 6 months after implementing the recommendations.
Keywords:Corresponding author    Quality indicators  Quality standards  Hip fracture registry  Indicadores de calidad  Estándares de calidad  Registro de fracturas de cadera
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号