首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Polygyny in the pied flycatcher,Ficedula hypoleuca: a test of the deception hypothesis
Institution:1. Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa;2. Department of Behavioural Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany;1. Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Australia;2. Department of Biomedical Science and Environmental Biology, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan;1. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, Key Laboratory of Tropical Animal and Plant Ecology of Hainan Province, College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 571158, China;2. Institute of Biological Resources, Jiangxi Academy of Science, Nanchang 330096, China;1. One Health Centre for Zoonoses and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, West Farm, St Kitts, West Indies;2. Department of Clinical Sciences, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, West Farm, St Kitts, West Indies;3. Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
Abstract:The deception hypothesis has been proposed as an explanation for polygyny in the pied flycatcher. According to this hypothesis, already-mated males hide their mating status with polyterritorial behaviour and thereby increase their chances of obtaining a second mate. In a study area at Oslo, Norway, secondary females raised 84% as many fledglings as did concurrent monogamous and primary females. The unmated males sang most of the time near their nest site, whereas the already-mated males frequently disrupted singing for longer periods in their secondary territories to visit their primary nest; such visits to the primary nest occurred both before and after the time of their second mating. The behaviour of the males suggests that deception of females is not an evolutionarily stable strategy, as an observant female would soon discern the male's status. Another difficulty with the deception hypothesis is that secondary females laid larger clutches than primary females. The number of young fledged from secondary nests was not dependent on the distance to the primary nest. The deception hypothesis was not supported by the data, and the reduced reproductive success of secondary females may be explained by the cost of searching for a mate.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号