In Vitro Kinetics of Prebiotic Inulin-Type Fructan Fermentation by Butyrate-Producing Colon Bacteria: Implementation of Online Gas Chromatography for Quantitative Analysis of Carbon Dioxide and Hydrogen Gas Production

Kinetic analyses of bacterial growth, carbohydrate consumption, and metabolite production of five butyrate-producing clostridial cluster XIVa colon bacteria grown on acetate plus fructose, oligofructose, inulin, or lactate were performed. A gas chromatography method was set up to assess H₂ and CO₂ production online and to ensure complete coverage of all metabolites produced. Method accuracy was confirmed through the calculation of electron and carbon recoveries. Fermentations with Anaerostipes caccae DSM 14662^T, Roseburia faecis DSM 16840^T, Roseburia hominis DSM 16839^T, and Roseburia intestinalis DSM 14610^T revealed similar patterns of metabolite production with butyrate, CO₂, and H₂ as the main metabolites. R. faecis DSM 16840^T and R. intestinalis DSM 14610^T were able to degrade oligofructose, displaying a nonpreferential breakdown mechanism. Lactate consumption was only observed with A. caccae DSM 14662^T. Roseburia inulinivorans DSM 16841^T was the only strain included in the present study that was able to grow on fructose, oligofructose, and inulin. The metabolites produced were lactate, butyrate, and CO₂, without H₂ production, indicating an energy metabolism distinct from that of other Roseburia species. Oligofructose degradation was nonpreferential. In a coculture of R. inulinivorans DSM 16841^T with the highly competitive strain Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum LMG 11047 on inulin, hardly any production of butyrate and CO₂ was detected, indicating a lack of competitiveness of the butyrate producer. Complete recovery of metabolites during fermentations of clostridial cluster XIVa butyrate-producing colon bacteria allowed stoichiometric balancing of the metabolic pathway for butyrate production, including H₂ formation.The implementation of 16S rRNA gene-based analytical techniques in the ongoing exploration of the microbial diversity of the human colon ecosystem has both broadened and sharpened the prevailing image of its population (17, 24, 32). While a rather conservative perception of the composition of the colon microbiota has dominated gut research for several decades (36), recent studies have revealed the importance of previously largely neglected bacterial groups and have reduced historically numerically overestimated subpopulations to their actual (marginal) size (8, 22, 52). The human colon has been shown to be a remarkably selective environment, which is reflected by a rather shallow microbial diversity (32). Species belonging to the bacterial divisions Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria make up more than 98% of the bacterial population of the human colon (2, 17, 24). However, this superficial uniformity only covers an overwhelming diversity at the lower taxonomic levels; the human colon has been estimated to harbor between 500 and 1,000 species, representing over 7,000 strains, with up to 80% of them considered uncultivable using presently available methodologies (14, 28, 53).Assessing identity and abundance of the major microbial groups composing the colon microbiota is a first and indispensable step toward a better understanding of the ecosystem of the large intestine (48). However, defining a complex ecosystem such as the human colon requires more than the construction of a catalog of its members (32). A major challenge of gastrointestinal microbiology lies in linking phylogenetic subgroups with particular ecological habitats and niches (7, 8, 23). The latter requires further development of highly discriminating 16S rRNA gene-targeted probes to monitor spatial bacterial distribution, combined with renewed efforts toward species isolation through the application of innovative cultivation methods and media, and extensive metabolic characterization of representative strains (19, 35, 48).Recently, a global ecological approach, combining efforts in probe development (1, 27), species isolation (3), and metabolic characterization (4, 11, 15, 20), has led to the identification of a functional group of microorganisms, composed of species belonging to the clostridial clusters IV and XIVa, that are responsible for colon butyrate production. As butyrate is regarded as a key metabolite for the maintenance of colon health, this functional subunit of the colon microbiota could have a major influence on human well-being and might be considered as a target for prebiotic dietary interventions (25, 35, 45). Some recently described lactate- and/or acetate-converting colon butyrate producers have been reported to be able to degrade prebiotic inulin-type fructans, although the kinetics of their respective breakdown mechanisms have hardly been investigated (10, 20). The enhancement of colon butyrate production observed after consumption of oligofructose or inulin (6, 31, 40)—the so-called butyrogenic effect—as well as the limited stimulatory effect of these prebiotics on the clostridial cluster IV and XIVa colon populations (16, 30) have been attributed to cross-feeding with bifidobacteria, which are still considered the primary fructan degraders (5, 38). Anaerostipes caccae as well as Roseburia spp. have been shown to be able to (co)metabolize end products of bifidobacterial fructan fermentation (lactate and/or acetate) or to grow on short oligosaccharides and monosaccharides released by Bifidobacterium spp. during fructan degradation (4, 20).Recently, many clostridial cluster IV and XIVa butyrate producers characterized in detail have been shown to produce gases, mainly CO₂ and H₂ (12, 15, 20, 46). Consequently, they might be responsible for an enhancement of gas production as a result of fructan fermentation, through either cross-feeding or direct degradation of inulin-type fructans (15, 16). Indeed, inulin-type fructan consumption has been reported to cause some gastrointestinal discomfort related to gas production—essentially, flatulence and bloating (43)—while bifidobacteria, the main beneficiaries of dietary fructan intake, do not produce gases (19, 49). Although CO₂ and H₂ production by colon butyrate producers could have implications for human intestinal well-being, (in vitro) production has not been satisfactorily monitored up to now, probably due to limited availability of a performant apparatus for (online) gas analysis (15, 20). Moreover, the currently proposed pathway for colon butyrate production does not provide a conclusive quantitative link between bacterial (co)substrate metabolism and H₂ formation (11).This study investigated the kinetics of inulin-type fructan degradation by representatives of the genera Anaerostipes and Roseburia. A method based on online gas chromatography (GC) was developed to assess gas production qualitatively and quantitatively in a continuously sparged fermentation vessel for complete coverage of metabolite production. The competitiveness of inulin-degrading butyrate producers was investigated through coculture fermentations with Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum LMG 11047, a strain representing a highly competitive cluster of bifidobacteria that share both high fructose consumption and oligofructose degradation rates and are able to perform partial breakdown of inulin (18, 20). A stoichiometrically balanced pathway for butyrate production, including H₂ production, is proposed.