首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Continued misuse of multiple testing correction methods in population genetics‐A wake‐up call?
Authors:Arun Sethuraman  Nicolette M Gonzalez  Christy E Grenier  Khyati S Kansagra  Ken K Mey  Stefany B Nunez‐Zavala  Bryce E W Summerhays  Gwendalyn K Wulf
Abstract:Population geneticists often use multiple independent hypothesis tests of Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE), Linkage Disequilibrium (LD), and population differentiation, to make broad inferences about their systems of choice. However, correcting for Family‐Wise Error Rates (FWER) that are inflated due to multiple comparisons, is sparingly reported in our current literature. In this issue of Molecular Ecology Resources, perform a meta‐analysis of 215 population genetics studies published between 2011 and 2013 to show (i) scarce use of FWER corrections across all three classes of tests, and (ii) when used, inconsistent application of correction methods with a clear bias towards less‐conservative corrections for tests of population differentiation, than for tests of HWE, and LD. Here we replicate this meta‐analysis using 205 population genetics studies published between 2013 and 2018, to show the same continued disuse, and inconsistencies. We hope that both studies serve as a wake‐up call to population geneticists, reviewers, and editors to be rigorous about consistently correcting for FWER inflation.
Keywords:Bonferroni  FWER  multiple comparisons  population genetics—  empirical  type I error
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号