Modification of foliar solute concentrations by calcium in two species of wheat stressed with sodium chloride and/or potassium chloride

The effects of saline-stresses due to different salts on growth and on foliar solute concentrations in seedlings of two species of wheat that differed in salt tolerance. Triticum aestivum L. cv. Probred and Triticum turgidum L. (Durum group) cv. Aldura, were studied. Triticum aestivum is the more salt tolerant species. The salts used were NaCl, KCI, a 1:1 mixture of NaCI and KCI, and these same monovalent cation salts but mixed with CaCI₂ at a ratio of 2:1 on a molar basis of monovalent to divalent cation salts. Growth inhibition of both species was a function of media osmotic potentials. There was a small additional inhibition of growth if KCI replaced NaCI as the salinizing salt. CaCI₂ had little or no effect on growth inhibition beyond an osmotic effect except at the most severe stress level, i.e. when Ca²⁺ concentrations may be excessive. The amounts of water-soluble Ca²⁺ were about 10 times higher in leaves of plants grown in the presence of CaCI₂ than in its absence, but its concentrations even then were approximately 10% or less of those of the monovalent cations. Including CaCI₂ in growth media resulted in a reduction in the amount of Na⁺ in leaves compared to the amounts in plants grown at the same osmotic potential but in the absence of CaCI₂. Triticum aestivum was a better Na⁺-excluder than T. turgidum. With CaCI₂ in media, (Na⁺+ K⁺) remained relatively constant or increased by small amounts as media osmotic potentials décreased. In the absence of CaCI₂₊ (Na⁺+ K⁺) increased by large amounts when media osmotic potentials were at ?0.6 and ?0.8 MPa. It is concluded that the accumulation system in leaves for monovalent cations was under feed-back control, and that this control mechanism was inhibited by high media concentrations of Na⁺ and/or K⁺. Sucrose was present at a constant amount under all growth conditions. Proline started accumulating when (Na⁺+ K⁺) exceeded a threshold value of 200 μmol (g fresh weight)^?1. Its concentration was 5 to 13% of that portion of (Na⁺+ K⁺) that exceeded the threshold value.