In Situ Phylogenetic Structure and Diversity of Wild Bradyrhizobium Communities

Bacteria often infect their hosts from environmental sources, but little is known about how environmental and host-infecting populations are related. Here, phylogenetic clustering and diversity were investigated in a natural community of rhizobial bacteria from the genus Bradyrhizobium. These bacteria live in the soil and also form beneficial root nodule symbioses with legumes, including those in the genus Lotus. Two hundred eighty pure cultures of Bradyrhizobium bacteria were isolated and genotyped from wild hosts, including Lotus angustissimus, Lotus heermannii, Lotus micranthus, and Lotus strigosus. Bacteria were cultured directly from symbiotic nodules and from two microenvironments on the soil-root interface: root tips and mature (old) root surfaces. Bayesian phylogenies of Bradyrhizobium isolates were reconstructed using the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), and the structure of phylogenetic relatedness among bacteria was examined by host species and microenvironment. Inoculation assays were performed to confirm the nodulation status of a subset of isolates. Most recovered rhizobial genotypes were unique and found only in root surface communities, where little bacterial population genetic structure was detected among hosts. Conversely, most nodule isolates could be classified into several related, hyper-abundant genotypes that were phylogenetically clustered within host species. This pattern suggests that host infection provides ample rewards to symbiotic bacteria but that host specificity can strongly structure only a small subset of the rhizobial community.Symbiotic bacteria often encounter hosts from environmental sources (32, 48, 60), which leads to multipartite life histories including host-inhabiting and environmental stages. Research on host-associated bacteria, including pathogens and beneficial symbionts, has focused primarily on infection and proliferation in hosts, and key questions about the ecology and evolution of the free-living stages have remained unanswered. For instance, is host association ubiquitous within a bacterial lineage, or if not, do host-infecting genotypes represent a phylogenetically nonrandom subset? Assuming that host infection and free-living existence exert different selective pressures, do bacterial lineages diverge into specialists for these different lifestyles? Another set of questions addresses the degree to which bacteria associate with specific host partners. Do bacterial genotypes invariably associate with specific host lineages, and is such specificity controlled by one or both partners? Alternatively, is specificity simply a by-product of ecological cooccurrence among bacteria and hosts?Rhizobial bacteria comprise several distantly related proteobacterial lineages, most notably the genera Azorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, Mesorhizobium, Rhizobium, and Sinorhizobium (52), that have acquired the ability to form nodules on legumes and symbiotically fix nitrogen. Acquisition of nodulation and nitrogen fixation loci has likely occurred through repeated lateral transfer of symbiotic loci (13, 74). Thus, the term “rhizobia” identifies a suite of symbiotic traits in multiple genomic backgrounds rather than a taxonomic classification. When rhizobia infect legume hosts, they differentiate into specialized endosymbiotic cells called bacteroids, which reduce atmospheric nitrogen in exchange for photosynthates from the plant (35, 60). Rhizobial transmission among legume hosts is infectious. Rhizobia can spread among hosts through the soil (60), and maternal inheritance (through seeds) is unknown (11, 43, 55). Nodule formation on hosts is guided by reciprocal molecular signaling between bacteria and plant (5, 46, 58), and successful infection requires a compatible pairing of legume and rhizobial genotypes. While both host and symbiont genotypes can alter the outcome of rhizobial competition for adsorption (34) and nodulation (33, 39, 65) of legume roots, little is known about how this competition plays out in nature.Rhizobia can achieve reproductive success via multiple lifestyles (12), including living free in the soil (14, 44, 53, 62), on or near root surfaces (12, 18, 19, 51), or in legume nodules (60). Least is known about rhizobia in bulk soil (not penetrated by plant roots). While rhizobia can persist for years in soil without host legumes (12, 30, 61), it appears that growth is often negligible in bulk soil (4, 10, 14, 22, 25). Rhizobia can also proliferate in the rhizosphere (soil near the root zone) of legumes (4, 10, 18, 19, 22, 25, 51). Some rhizobia might specialize in rhizosphere growth and infect hosts only rarely (12, 14, 51), whereas other genotypes are clearly nonsymbiotic because they lack key genes (62) and must therefore persist in the soil. The best-understood rhizobial lifestyle is the root nodule symbiosis with legumes, which is thought to offer fitness rewards that are superior to life in the soil (12). After the initial infection, nodules grow and harbor increasing populations of bacteria until the nodules senesce and the rhizobia are released into the soil (11, 12, 38, 40, 55). However, rhizobial fitness in nodules is not guaranteed. Host species differ in the type of nodules they form, and this can determine the degree to which differentiated bacteroids can repopulate the soil (11, 12, 38, 59). Furthermore, some legumes can hinder the growth of nodules with ineffective rhizobia, thus punishing uncooperative symbionts (11, 27, 28, 56, 71).Here, we investigated the relationships between environmental and host-infecting populations of rhizobia. A main objective was to test the hypothesis that rhizobia exhibit specificity among host species as well as among host microenvironments, specifically symbiotic nodules, root surfaces, and root tips. We predicted that host infection and environmental existence exert different selective pressures on rhizobia, leading to divergent patterns of clustering, diversity, and abundance of rhizobial genotypes.