Experimental assessment of trophic ecology in a generalist spider predator: Implications for biocontrol in Uruguayan crops |
| |
Authors: | Luis Fernando García Erika Núñez Mariángeles Lacava Horacio Silva Sebastián Martínez Julien Pétillon |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Grupo multidisciplinario en Ecología para la Agricultura, Centro Universitario Regional del Este (CURE), Universidad de la República, Treinta y Tres, Uruguay;2. PDU Estudios interdisciplinarios de Sistemas Territoriales Complejos, CENUR Noreste, Universidad de la República, Rivera, Uruguay;3. Estación Experimental Mario A. Cassinoni, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Paysandú, Uruguay;4. Estación Experimental INIA Treinta y Tres, Programa Nacional de Arroz, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Treinta y Tres, Uruguay;5. UMR CNRS 5563 Ecobio, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France |
| |
Abstract: | Conservative biological control promotes the use of native natural enemies to limit the size and growth of pest populations. Although spiders constitute one of the most important groups of native predators in several crops, their trophic ecology remains largely unknown, especially for several generalist taxa. In laboratory, we assessed the predatory behaviour of a wandering spider (the wolf spider Lycosa thorelli (Keyserling, 1877) against several arthropods varying in size and trophic positions, all found in South American soybean and rice crops. As prey we used the bug Piezodorus guildinii (Westwood, 1837) as well as larvae and adults of the moth Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith, 1797), both being considered important pests in Uruguayan crops. We also used several non-pest arthropods as prey, sarcophagid flies, carabid beetles and wolf spiders. All prey were attacked in more or less high, although not statistically differing, proportions. However, carabids were not consumed, and bugs were consumed in significantly lower proportions than flies. A negative correlation was found between prey size and acceptance rate. Immobilization times were longer against larvae when compared to moths and flies, while predatory sequences were longer for bugs when compared to flies, moths and spiders. In addition, we found a positive effect of prey size on predatory sequence length and complexity. Our results confirm the ability of spiders to attack and feed upon prey with different morphologies, included well-defended arthropods, and their potential use as natural enemies of several pests in South American crops. |
| |
Keywords: | behavioural sequence biological control conditional prey acceptance rice soybean wolf spider |
|
|