首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

京津风沙源区沙障固沙技术评价指标体系构建
引用本文:丁新辉,刘孝盈,刘广全,朱毕生,王炜炜.京津风沙源区沙障固沙技术评价指标体系构建[J].生态学报,2019,39(16):5778-5786.
作者姓名:丁新辉  刘孝盈  刘广全  朱毕生  王炜炜
作者单位:中国水利水电科学研究院;国际泥沙研究培训中心;北京林淼生态环境技术有限公司
基金项目:“十三五”国家重点研发计划课题(2016YFC0503704,2016YFC0501705,2016YFC0501602);深圳市铁汉生态环境股份有限公司资助项目(THRD016)
摘    要:由于构成材料、规格形状以及自然风向和地貌形态的多样性,不同沙障固沙技术的固沙效果有较大差异,如何科学客观的筛选沙障固沙技术,是保证沙障固沙技术长期稳定发挥其最大作用的重要基础。针对京津风沙源区沙障固沙技术效果评价问题,建立了沙障固沙技术评价的方法体系,明确了沙障固沙技术评价指标集、评价指标权重以及沙障固沙技术评价面临的问题。在沙障固沙技术与地区自然条件、经济发展水平相协调的前提下,基于文献频次法和层次分析法(analytic hierarchy process,AHP)从技术成熟度、技术应用难度、技术相宜性、技术效益、技术推广潜力5个方面共筛选出1项判断性指标、4项准则性指标、14项二级指标和25项三级指标指标,构建沙障固沙技术评价指标体系。该指标体系以技术效益为主导,兼顾功能性和应用性综合评价,从而对京津风沙源区沙障固沙技术进行全面评价。

关 键 词:沙障固沙技术  层次分析法  文献频次法  指标权重
收稿时间:2018/11/25 0:00:00
修稿时间:2019/5/23 0:00:00

Establishing evaluation index system for sand-barrier technologies in Beijing-Tianjin sand source regions
DING Xinhui,LIU Xiaoying,LIU Guangquan,ZHU Bisheng and WANG Weiwei.Establishing evaluation index system for sand-barrier technologies in Beijing-Tianjin sand source regions[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(16):5778-5786.
Authors:DING Xinhui  LIU Xiaoying  LIU Guangquan  ZHU Bisheng and WANG Weiwei
Institution:China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China;International Research and Training Centre on Erosion and Sedimentation, Beijing 100048, China,China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China;International Research and Training Centre on Erosion and Sedimentation, Beijing 100048, China,China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China;International Research and Training Centre on Erosion and Sedimentation, Beijing 100048, China,China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China and Beijing Linmiao Ecological Environment Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100085, China
Abstract:Due to the diversity of materials, specifications and shapes, the natural wind directions and landforms, the sand-fixing effects of different sand-barrier technologies are quite different. The scientific and objective screening methods of sand-barrier technology are an important basis for ensuring the sand-fixing technology to play its maximum role in a long-term and stable way. Aiming at the effect evaluation for sand-barrier technologies in the Beijing and Tianjin sand source regions, an evaluation system of sand-barrier technologies was established in this paper. We also defined the evaluation indexes and its weight, clarified the problems faced by the evaluation of sand barrier. Under the premise of sand-barrier technologies in harmony with the natural conditions, economic developmentand based on literature frequency method and analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the evaluation index system of sand-barrier technologies were screened from technology maturity, technology application difficulty, technology suitability, technology benefit, technology promotion potential 5 aspects. The final evaluation index system consisted of one index of judgment layer, four indexes of criterion layer, 14 indexes of indicator layer, and 25 indexes of sub-indicator layer., The index system, taking the technology benefit as the leading factor and considering the comprehensive evaluation of function and application, was used to carry out the full evaluation of sand-barrier technologies in the Beijing and Tianjin sand source regions.
Keywords:sand barrier technology  analytic hierarchy process  literature frequency method  index weight
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号