河南省淮河流域鳑鲏亚科5种鱼形态差异分析 |
| |
引用本文: | 王景龙,陈启豪,陆文泽,袁淑琴,胡清霞,岑双双,周传江,孟晓林,聂国兴,顾钱洪. 河南省淮河流域鳑鲏亚科5种鱼形态差异分析[J]. 水生生物学报, 2019, 43(1): 123-132. DOI: 10.7541/2019.16 |
| |
作者姓名: | 王景龙 陈启豪 陆文泽 袁淑琴 胡清霞 岑双双 周传江 孟晓林 聂国兴 顾钱洪 |
| |
作者单位: | 河南师范大学水产学院 |
| |
摘 要: | 为进一步从可量性状比较中华鳑鲏(Rhodeus sinensis)、越南鱊(Acheilongnathus tonkinensis)、大鳍鱊(A. macropterus)、兴凯鱊(A. chankaensis)和斑条鱊(A. taenianalis)的种间形态差异, 丰富鳑鲏亚科鱼类的形态分类特征, 研究采用多变量形态度量学方法对河南省淮河流域这5种鱼的形态进行比较分析。结果表明: 这5种鱼在体宽/体长、头长/体长、吻长/体长、尾柄长/体长、背鳍基底长/体长、腹鳍长/体长、臀鳍长/体长和头长/吻长8个比值性状上存在极显著性差异(P< 0.01), 在全长/体长、体高/体长2个比值性状上存在显著性差异(P<0.05), 这些差异主要集中在鱼体的头部、尾部和鳍等部位。主成分分析、聚类分析和判别分析显示5种鱼存在显著性形态差异, 斑条鱊与越南鱊的差异程度最大, 与大鳍鱊差异程度最小。判别分析获得的判别准确率在82.35%—100.00%变化, 可以从一定的角度区分这5种鱼。
|
关 键 词: | 鳑鲏亚科 形态差异 单因素方差分析 主成分分析 判别分析 聚类分析 |
收稿时间: | 2018-01-25 |
MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES AMONG FIVE SPECIES IN RHODEINAE IN HUAIHE RIVER BASIN IN HENAN PROVINCE |
| |
Abstract: | Different species of Rhodeinae have been wildly distributed across China. Different species have shown very similar morphological characteristics, making their distinguish to be indeed difficult. In order to compare the morphological differences among Rhodeus sinensis, Acheilongnathus tonkinensis, A. macropterus, A. chankaensis and A. taenianalis by the morphometric characteristics, and enrich the classification features, multivariate morphometrics were used to analyze the morphological variations of five Rhodeinae species in Huaihe River Basin (Henan province, China). The results showed that there were significant differences in the body’s width/body’s length, head’s length/body’s length, snout’s length/body’s length, caudal peduncle’s length/body’s length, dorsal fin base’s length/body’s length, pectoral fin’s length/body’s length, pelvic fin’s length/body’s length, and head’s length/snout’s length among the five species (P<0.01), and there were significant differences in the total length/body’s length and body’s height/body’s length (P<0.05). Therefore, these differences mainly focus on the head, tail, fin, and so on. Principal component analysis, discriminant analysis, and cluster analysis showed that the five species had obvious morphological differences, the most significant difference betweenA. taenianalis and A. tonkinensis was found, and the most insignificant difference was observed between A. taenianalis and A. macropterus. The discriminant accuracy rate of the five species varied from 82.35% to 100%, effectively realizing the distinguish of the five Rhodeinae species. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录! |
| 点击此处可从《水生生物学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《水生生物学报》下载全文 |
|