首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Axillary bud flowering after apical decapitation in Pharbitis in relation to photoinduction
Authors:Michiyuki Ono  Kimiyo Sage Ono  Koichiro Yamada  Masaru Yasui  Mitsuo Okazaki
Affiliation:M. Ono (corresponding author, present address: Biotechnology Institute, Akita Prefectural College of Agriculture, Ohgala, Akita 010–04, Japan) et al., Dept of Applied Biology, Faculty of Textile Science and Technology, Shinshu Univ., Veda, Nagano 386, Japan.
Abstract:The flowering response of axillary buds of seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy, cv. Violet, was examined in relation to the timing of apical bud removal (plumule including the first leaf or second leaf) before or after a flower-inductive 16-h dark period. When the apical bud was removed well before the dark period, flower buds formed on the axillary shoots that subsequently developed, but when removed just before, or after, the dark period, different results were observed depending on the timing of the apical bud removal and plant age. In the case of 8-day-old seedlings, fewer flower buds formed on the axillary shoots developing from the cotyledonary node when plumules were removed 20 to 0 h before the dark period. When the apical bud was removed after the dark period, no flower buds formed. Using 14-day-old seedlings a similar reduction of flowering response was observed on the axillary shoots developing from the first leaf node when the apical bud was removed just after the dark period. To further elucidate the relationship between apical dominance and flowering, kinetin or IAA was applied to axillary buds or the cut site where the apical bud was located. Both chemicals influenced flowering, probably by modulating apical dominance which normally forces axillary buds to be dormant.
Keywords:Apical dominance    auxin    axillary bud    cytokinin    decapitation    floral stimulus    morning glory    Pharbitis nil    photoperiod    short day
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号