Comparisons of Some Chi-squared Tests for the Test of Independence in Sparse Two-Way Contingency Tables

We consider in this paper, the behaviour of a class of the CRESSIE READ (1984) power divergence test statistics indexed by parameter λ - I (λ), with the modified X₂ test statistics (LU) proposed by LAWAL and UPTON (1984), for sparse contingency tables ranging from the 3×3 to the 10×10. We present a sample of our results here. The results indicate that the LU test out-performs either the Cressie-Read suggested test I(2/3) or the Pearson's test - I(1). Our results further show that the modification to the likelihood ratio test Y₂ = I'(0)] proposed by WILLIAMS (1976) performs like the parent Y₂ test, very poorly compared with either the I(2/3), X₂ or the LU test statistics. Power results also indicate that the powers of the LU test are in all cases considered in this study slightly higher than those of X₂ and I(2/3) tests. The LU test is therefore strongly recommended for use with sparse two-way contingency tables because in all of the cases considered, none of the other test statistics consistently out-performs the LU test with respect to attained α level or power.