Abstract: | To assess the ecological consequences of selective logging in the major rainforest areas in Australia, past studies are reviewed with respect to the following: recovery of stand structure; regeneration capacity; individual tree growth and species composition of stands; hydrologie impact; floristics; wildlife; soil nutrient levels; fire susceptibility; and incursion of weeds and diseases. Although rainforest logging has become a sensitive issue in the community and its effects are of concern to ecologists, relatively few scientific studies of selective logging have been published. Thus, the full nature and extent of ecological changes to Australian rainforests due to this form of disturbance cannot yet be determined. However, some cautious interpretation of the studies that have been completed is possible. Following a single selective logging, the changes indicated by individual studies often appeared to be relatively minor. It is suggested that many of these effects are not extensive or irreversible and might not persist beyond structural recovery of the rainforest. However, two changes were identified as likely to persist beyond structural recovery. These are: a post-logging difference in the proportional representation of major overstorey tree species and a reduction in the numbers of large-diameter trees. Further, results indicate that more extensive and longer-lasting changes may result from multiple selective loggings, especially if the time between successive loggings is short. Even with light logging intensities, a conservative interval of at least 60 years between selective loggings, to allow canopy and below-canopy conditions to be restored, is indicated. Apart from disturbance frequency, the studies reviewed raise questions as to whether long-term natural disturbance effects per se are distinguishable from long-term selective logging effects. A need for further work is highlighted. Overall, there appears to be a distinction between the recovery capability of the more northerly mainland rainforests and those of Tasmania. Slower growth in the more southerly rainforests, compounded by a geographical susceptibility to summer drought, increases the possibility of fire damage following selective logging. |