| Abstract: | The distribution of individuals among habitats that vary in quality (i.e. resource availability) may affect reproductive output at a population level. I compared indicators of habitat quality including the breeding experience ratios (inexperienced:experienced birds), turnover rates, pairing success, and densities of a forest songbird, the Eastern Yellow Robin Eopsaltria australis , in two small, food-poor forest fragments, with those in two large, food-rich fragments. I then evaluated the likelihood that the breeding experience ratio affected the reproductive output of populations. Inexperienced males occurred in small fragments eight times as often as in large fragments. Male turnover rates were 1.5 times higher in the small than large fragments, and 20% (10/50) of the male population were unpaired in the small fragments compared to 0% (0/25) in the large. None of these measures differed significantly for females. Experienced birds of both sexes produced almost all of the offspring compared with inexperienced birds. Despite these findings, reproductive output did not vary with fragment size for robins. Thus, while breeding experience clearly influenced the reproductive success of individuals, there were no obvious population consequences of having disproportionately more inexperienced males in the small fragments. I conclude that while male traits may be good indicators of resource levels within fragments (specifically, food availability), they may not be adequate predictors of population performance. Thus, the reproductive output of populations must be measured directly before conclusions concerning population performance can be made. Interestingly, breeding densities were not accurate indicators of either resource levels or population performance. Densities were two times higher in the smaller fragments, and I suggest that this result reflects problems with male dispersal among fragments caused by isolation. |
