首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Diastolic Dysfunction Is an Independent Predictor of Cardiovascular Events in Incident Dialysis Patients with Preserved Systolic Function
Authors:Jae Hyun Han  Ji Suk Han  Eun Jin Kim  Fa Mee Doh  Hyang Mo Koo  Chan Ho Kim  Mi Jung Lee  Hyung Jung Oh  Jung Tak Park  Seung Hyeok Han  Dong-Ryeol Ryu  Tae-Hyun Yoo  Shin-Wook Kang
Institution:1. Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.; 2. Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.; 3. Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Brain Korea 21 PLUS project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.; Children’s Hospital Boston/Harvard Medical School, UNITED STATES,
Abstract:

Background

Diastolic heart failure (HF), the prevalence of which is gradually increasing, is associated with cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality in the general population and, more specifically, in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, the impact of diastolic dysfunction on CV outcomes has not been studied in incident dialysis patients with preserved systolic function.

Methods

This prospective observational cohort study investigates the clinical consequence of diastolic dysfunction and the predictive power of diastolic echocardiographic parameters for CV events in 194 incident ESRD patients with normal or near normal systolic function, who started dialysis between July 2008 and August 2012.

Results

During a mean follow-up duration of 27.2 months, 57 patients (29.4%) experienced CV events. Compared to the CV event-free group, patients with CV events had a significantly higher left ventricular (LV) mass index, ratio of early mitral flow velocity (E) to early mitral annulus velocity (E’) (E/E’), LA volume index (LAVI), deceleration time, and right ventricular systolic pressure, and a significantly lower LV ejection fraction and E’. In multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, E/E’>15 and LAVI>32 mL/m2 significantly predicted CV events (E/E’>15: hazard ratio HR] = 5.40, 95% confidence interval CI] = 2.73–10.70, P< .001; LAVI>32 mL/m2: HR = 5.56, 95% CI = 2.28–13.59, P< .001]. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with both E/E’>15 and LAVI>32mL/m2 had the worst CV outcomes.

Conclusion

An increase in E/E’ or LAVI is a significant risk factor for CV events in incident dialysis patients with preserved LV systolic function.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号