Nematospiroides dubius: Mechanisms of host immunity: II. Skin testing and immunosuppression of orally or subcutaneously sensitized mice

The present study was designed to acquire further understanding of the differences in the immune response of mice orally (OS) or subcutaneously (SS) sensitized to Nematospiroides dubius. Two immunosuppressive agents and skin tests were utilized in this regard.Rabbit antimouse thymus serum (RAMTS) and cyproheptadine (antihistamine-antiserotonin) were similarly effective in suppressing the immune response of subcutaneously sensitized mice. When compared to normal rabbit serum and SS control (sensitized, untreated) animals, observations of the intestinal tunica muscularis in the immunosuppressed SS groups revealed granulomatous lesions in which fewer eosinophils enveloped the sequestered parasite. Cyproheptadine was more successful than the other treatments in interrupting the immune expulsion of N. dubius from orally sensitized mice, but this was only at a borderline significance level.The size and intensity of the active cutaneous anaphylactic skin tests in OS mice injected with an adult or larval antigen, was greater than the response elicited in SS mice or uninfected control mice injected with the same preparations. Similarly, the reaction in subcutaneously sensitized mice exceeded that observed in the noninfected controls.