Climate‐sensitive ecosystem carbon dynamics along the soil chronosequence of the Damma glacier forefield,Switzerland |
| |
Authors: | Rienk H. Smittenberg Merle Gierga Hans Göransson Iso Christl Daniel Farinotti Stefano M. Bernasconi |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Geological Institute, ETH Zurich, , 8092 Zürich, Switzerland;2. Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, , 8092 Zürich, Switzerland;3. Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zurich, , 8092 Zürich, Switzerland;4. Laboratory of hydraulics, hydrology and glaciology, ETH Zurich, , 8092 Zürich, Switzerland |
| |
Abstract: | We performed a detailed study on the carbon build‐up over the 140‐year‐long chronosequence of the Damma glacier forefield, Switzerland, to gain insights into the organic carbon dynamics during the initial stage of soil formation and ecosystem development. We determined soil carbon and nitrogen contents and their stable isotopic compositions, as well as molecular‐level composition of the bulk soils, and recalcitrance parameters of carbon in different fractions. The chronosequence was divided into three age groups, separated by small end moraines that resulted from two glacier re‐advances. The net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) showed an exponential increase over the last decades, with mean annual values that range from 100 g C m?2 yr?1 in the youngest part to over 300 g C m?2 yr?1 in a 60–80 years old part. However, over the entire 140‐year chronosequence, the NECB is only 20 g C m?2 yr?1, similar to results of other glacier forefield studies. The difference between the short‐ and long‐term NECB appears to be caused by reductions in ecosystem carbon (EC) accumulation during periods with a colder climate. We propose that two complementary mechanisms have been responsible: 1) Reductions in net primary productivity down to 50% below the long‐term mean, which we estimated using reconstructed effective temperature sums. 2) Disturbance of sites near the terminus of the re‐advanced glacier front. Stabilization of soil organic matter appeared to play only a minor role in the coarse‐grained forefield. We conclude that the forefield ecosystem, especially primary productivity, reacts rapidly to climate changes. The EC gained at warm periods is easily lost again in a cooling climate. Our conclusions may also be valid for other high mountain ecosystems and possibly arctic ecosystems. |
| |
Keywords: | carbon cycle chronosequence climate sensitivity effective temperature sum glacier forefield net ecosystem carbon balance |
|
|