Solving alpha‐diversity by morphological markers contributes to arranging the systematic status of a crayfish species complex (Crustacea,Decapoda)

Since innovative molecular approaches in phylogenetics solely based on small gene fragments have often generated widely complicated interpretations of crayfish diversity, we propose a geometric morphometric study integrated with previous molecular data to provide robust estimates of phylogeny and classification of the Austropotamobius pallipes complex, genetically divided into several species and subspecies. We discuss whether cephalothorax shape variation can show phylogenetic signals congruent to those derived from analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Our results support the hypothesis that carapace form is potentially informative in the reconstruction of crayfish phylogeny. In the phenetic analyses, populations collected within the Italian territory form different unexpected clusters, each involving distant populations of different genetic haplogroups, suggesting a within‐species convergence probably due to a series of local adaptations. The phylogenetic analysis performed using a neighbour‐joining algorithm showed interesting relationships amongst the studied populations. In particular, the geometric morphometric matrices showed a slight congruence with some genetic distances, allowing the discrimination of three major lineages: (1) Istran + Apennine group; (2) Arno group; (3) north‐western group. Finally, our observations support some molecular data with a lighter phylogenetic signal that do not suggest a strong separation of A. pallipes into clades and sub‐clades.