CT Attenuation Values of Blood and Myocardium: Rationale for Accurate Coronary Artery Calcifications Detection with Multi-Detector CT |
| |
Authors: | Salah D. Qanadli Anne-Marie Jouannic Jamshid Dehmeshki Tri-Linh Lu |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.; 2. Quantitative Medical Imaging International Institute, Digital Imaging Research center, Faculty of Computing, Information Systems and Mathematics, University of Kingston, London, United Kingdom.; University of Minnesota, UNITED STATES, |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectivesTo determine inter-session and intra/inter-individual variations of the attenuations of aortic blood/myocardium with MDCT in the context of calcium scoring. To evaluate whether these variations are dependent on patients’ characteristics.MethodsFifty-four volunteers were evaluated with calcium scoring non-enhanced CT. We measured attenuations (inter-individual variation) and standard deviations (SD, intra-individual variation) of the blood in the ascending aorta and of the myocardium of left ventricle. Every volunteer was examined twice to study the inter-session variation. The fat pad thickness at the sternum and noise (SD of air) were measured too. These values were correlated with the measured aortic/ventricular attenuations and their SDs (Pearson). Historically fixed thresholds (90 and 130 HU) were tested against different models based on attenuations of blood/ventricle.ResultsThe mean attenuation was 46HU (range, 17-84HU) with mean SD 23HU for the blood, and 39HU (10-82HU) with mean SD 18 HU for the myocardium. The attenuation/SD of the blood were significantly higher than those of the myocardium (p<0.01). The inter-session variation was not significant. There was a poor correlation between SD of aortic blood/ventricle with fat thickness/noise. Based on existing models, 90 HU threshold offers a confidence interval of approximately 95% and 130 HU more than 99%.ConclusionsHistorical thresholds offer high confidence intervals for exclusion of aortic blood/myocardium and by the way for detecting calcifications. Nevertheless, considering the large variations of blood/myocardium CT values and the influence of patient’s characteristics, a better approach might be an adaptive threshold. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|