首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

棉铃发育期棉花源库活性对棉铃对位叶氮浓度的响应
引用本文:高相彬,王友华,陈兵林,李健,周治国. 棉铃发育期棉花源库活性对棉铃对位叶氮浓度的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(1): 238-246
作者姓名:高相彬  王友华  陈兵林  李健  周治国
作者单位:南京农业大学/农业部南方作物生理生态重点开放实验室,南京农业大学/农业部南方作物生理生态重点开放实验室,南京农业大学/农业部南方作物生理生态重点开放实验室,南京农业大学/农业部南方作物生理生态重点开放实验室,南京农业大学/农业部南方作物生理生态重点开放实验室
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目);国家教育部博士点基金
摘    要:采用大田试验,以3个铃期差异明显的棉花品种为材料,研究了不同施氮量形成的棉铃对位叶氮浓度对棉花花铃期纤维发育源库活性指标的影响。结果表明:在花后同一时期,棉铃对位叶可溶性糖、蔗糖含量和磷酸蔗糖合成酶活性以及棉纤维蔗糖含量和蔗糖合成酶活性等均随对位叶氮浓度的升高呈先升高后降低的变化趋势(45、52 DPA(花后天数Days post anthesis)的纤维蔗糖含量趋势相反),可用抛物线方程Y=ax2+bx+c拟合(P<0.01),通过拟合方程得到各指标所对应的最佳对位叶氮浓度。45 DPA(德夏棉1号38 DPA)前,花后同一时期各指标对应的最佳对位叶氮浓度差异较小,通过幂函数方程建立最佳叶氮浓度随花后天数的拟合方程,得到纤维发育期内源库活性各指标达到或接近最优状态时的适宜对位叶氮浓度的动态方程。本试验条件下,德夏棉1号、科棉1号和美棉33B的适宜对位叶氮浓度的拟合方程分别为N德1=7.2263DPA-0.276(R2=0.9805**)、N科1=7.23DPA-0.3026(R2=0.9861**)、N美33B=7.0997DPA-0.2814(R2=0.9807**)。

关 键 词:棉花  棉铃  棉铃对位叶  叶氮浓度  源活性  库活性
收稿时间:2010-11-26
修稿时间:2011-07-01

Effect of nitrogen concentration in the subtending leaves of cotton bolls on the strength of source and sink during boll development
GAO Xiangbin,WANG Youhu,CHEN Binglin,LI Jian and ZHOU Zhiguo. Effect of nitrogen concentration in the subtending leaves of cotton bolls on the strength of source and sink during boll development[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(1): 238-246
Authors:GAO Xiangbin  WANG Youhu  CHEN Binglin  LI Jian  ZHOU Zhiguo
Affiliation:Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology & Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture/Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology & Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture/Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology & Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture/Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology & Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture/Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology & Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture/Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
Abstract:Abstract: Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fiber plays an important role in the textile industry. Cotton fiber comes from the individual cotton bolls, so boll weight is a factor which can affect fiber yield. Boll weight is affected by genotype, environmental conditions, management practices, and other factors. Today, with superior cultivars and stable climatic and environmental conditions, management practices have become important in improving fiber yield. Nitrogen, the most important crop nutrient, has a regulatory role in crop growth. Crop yield is very commonly controlled by regulating the field application of nitrogen. The use of too much or too little nitrogen can decrease crop growth and yield. Thus, it is very important to find the optimal nitrogen levels needed to maximize fiber yield. Boll weights are controlled by both source and sink strength. Soluble sugar content, sucrose content and sucrose phosphate synthase activity are important indicators of source strength in the leaves subtending cotton bolls. Also, sucrose content and sucrose synthase activity are important indicators of sink strength in cotton fibers. Higher source and sink strength are beneficial in improving fiber yield, so finding the optimal nitrogen level is necessary for each indicator of source and sink strength. The nitrogen status of a cotton plant is more accurately reflected by the nitrogen concentration in the leaves subtending the cotton bolls than by the nitrogen application rate. So we tried to establish a quantitative relationship between leaf nitrogen concentration and each indicator to determine the optimal nitrogen level needed to achieve maximum boll weight. A field experiment was conducted to study the relationship between leaf nitrogen concentration and source and sink strength during boll development. Three cotton cultivars (Dexiamian 1, Kemian 1 and NuCOTN 33B) and five N application rates (0, 120, 240, 360 and 480 kgN/ha) were used. The result showed that as leaf nitrogen concentration increased, the indicators of source and sink strength initially increased and then decreased when measured at 10, 17, 24, 31 and 38 DPA (days post anthesis). As an exception, fiber sucrose content decreased initially and then increased at 45 and 52 DPA. The relationships between each indicator and leaf nitrogen concentration followed quadratic curves (Y=ax2 bx c), in which Y stands for the content or the activity of source and sink strength indicators, x is the leaf nitrogen concentration, and a, b and c are parameters determined by the cotton cultivar. The results show there is a leaf nitrogen concentration for each indicator of source and sink strength that is the optimal theoretical value. The optimal leaf nitrogen concentration for each indicator can be determined by using the equations. The differences between the optimal leaf nitrogen concentration for each indicator were small before 45 DPA (38 DPA for Dexiamian 1). The equations for the optimal leaf nitrogen concentration in relationship to time (DPA) for Dexiamian 1 (before 38 DPA), Kemian 1, and NuCOTN33B (before 45 DPA) were NDexiamian1=7.2263DPA-0.276(R2=0.9805**), NKemian1=7.23DPA-0.3026(R2=0.9861**), and NNuCOTN33B=7.0997DPA-0.2814 (R2=0.9807**), respectively. However, in the remainder of the boll development period, the optimal leaf nitrogen concentration for source strength in the subtending leaf of bolls was quite different when compared with the optimal leaf nitrogen concentration for sucrose synthase in the fiber. This research suggests that we could optimize leaf source strength and fiber sink strength to improve boll weight by regulating nitrogen concentration of the subtending the leaf boll.
Keywords:Cotton   Cotton boll   Subtending leaves of cotton bolls   Leaf nitrogen concentration   Source strength   Sink strength
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号