Patient-specific IMRT QA verification using machine learning and gamma radiomics |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Physics, Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes 3900, 14040-901, Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil;2. Radiotherapy Department, Ribeirão Preto Medical School Hospital and Clinics, University of São Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes 3900, 14040-900, Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil;1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands;2. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands;1. INSERM UA7 STROBE, University Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France;2. Imaging and Medical Beamline, Australian Synchrotron, Melbourne, Australia;3. ID17, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France;4. Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom;5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany;6. Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom;7. Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital (CHU-GA), Grenoble, France;1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China;2. School of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing, China;3. Brainnetome Center & National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China;4. School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China;5. Department of Radiation Therapy, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China;6. Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China;7. Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China;8. Department of Radiation Therapy, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, China;9. Department of Radiotherapy, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Xi''an, China;10. Department of Radiation Oncology, General Hospital of People''s Liberation Army, Beijing, China;11. Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China;12. Medical Physics Department, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States;13. Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China;14. State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.;1. Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, 120/1 Andul Road, Howrah 711103, West Bengal, India;2. XLRI Xavier School of Management, Circuit House Area (East), Jamshedpur 831001, Jharkhand, India;1. 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, Greece;2. Medical Physics Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece |
| |
Abstract: | Gamma function is the standard methodology for comparing dose distributions. It is calculated in dedicated software, and its results verification is not performed. Thus we developed an automatic tool for patient-specific QA results verification through high accuracy machine learning (ML) models based on the radiomics characteristics extraction from gamma images. We used 158 patient-specific QA tests and extracted 105 radiomics features from each gamma image. Three random forest models were developed (ML I, ML II, and ML III). ML I and ML II verified the gamma image approval using criteria of 2%/2mm/15% threshold and 3%/3mm/15% threshold, respectively. ML III verified if the gamma analyzes software recommended protocol was followed to detect if the TPS grid modification step was done. The models were based on the most important features selected using the mean decreased impurity, and their performances were evaluated. ML I included 25 features. Its accuracy was 0.85 using the test set and 0.84 using dataset B. ML II included 10 features, and its accuracy with the test set was 0.98; the same value was achieved using the never seen data (dataset B). The First-order 10th percentile feature was identified as a feature strongly related to the approved classification. ML III selected 23 features with an accuracy of 0.99 for test set and 0.98 for dataset B. An automatic workflow example for gamma analyses QA results verification could be proposed combining the models to detect grid inconsistencies on software evaluation, followed by the test approval classification. |
| |
Keywords: | Gamma Radiomics Predictive model Machine learning |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|