首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

涡度相关法和静态箱/气相色谱法在生态系统呼吸观测中的比较
引用本文:郑泽梅,于贵瑞,孙晓敏,曹广民,王跃思,杜明远,李俊,李英年.涡度相关法和静态箱/气相色谱法在生态系统呼吸观测中的比较[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(2):290-298.
作者姓名:郑泽梅  于贵瑞  孙晓敏  曹广民  王跃思  杜明远  李俊  李英年
作者单位:1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室CERN综合研究中心, 北京 100101; ;2.中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100039;;3.中国科学院西北高原生物研究所, 西宁 810001;;4.中国科学院大气物理研究所, 北京 100029;;5.日本农林环境技术研究所, 日本筑波 3058604
基金项目:中国科学院基金 , 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)
摘    要:基于涡度相关法和静态箱/气相色谱法(箱式法)的碳通量观测数据,对比分析了两种方法在评价禹城冬小麦 夏玉米复种农田生态系统和海北高寒矮嵩草草甸生态系统呼吸中的差异.结果表明:在保证涡度相关法和箱式法观测数据质量的条件下,两种方法实时观测的夜间通量结果具有较好的一致性,相关系数达0.95~0.98;箱式法白天的观测结果与涡度相关法估算的白天生态系统呼吸值有较好的一致性,但前者普遍大于后者;两种方法测定生态系统呼吸日平均值的差异达极显著水平(P<0.01),但二者的季节变化趋势较一致.在整个观测期内, 冬小麦-夏玉米复种农田观测箱内外平均温差为1.8 ℃,涡度相关法较箱式法测定的生态系统呼吸日平均值偏低30.3%;高寒矮嵩草草甸观测箱内外平均温差为1.9 ℃,涡度相关法较箱式法测定的生态系统呼吸日平均值偏低31.4%.两种方法对生态系统生长季呼吸日平均值测定结果的偏差高于非生长季.

关 键 词:大兴安岭  综合赋权  抚育采伐  优化模拟  林分结构  
文章编号:1001-9332(2008)02-0290-09
收稿时间:2007-03-29
修稿时间:2007-12-17

Comparison of eddy covariance and static chamber/gas chromatogram methods in measuring ecosystem respiration.
ZHENG Ze-mei,YU Gui-rui,SUN Xiao-min,CAO Guang-min,WANG Yue-si,DU Ming-yuan,LI Jun,LI Ying-nian.Comparison of eddy covariance and static chamber/gas chromatogram methods in measuring ecosystem respiration.[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2008,19(2):290-298.
Authors:ZHENG Ze-mei  YU Gui-rui  SUN Xiao-min  CAO Guang-min  WANG Yue-si  DU Ming-yuan  LI Jun  LI Ying-nian
Institution:Synthesis Research Center of Chinese Ecosystem Research Network, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Inst. Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Acad of Sciences, Beijing, China. zhengzm.05b@igsnrr.ac.cn
Abstract:Based on the measurement of carbon flux by the methods of eddy covariance and static chamber/gas chromatogram, a comparison was made between the two methods in evaluating ecosystem respiration over winter wheat (Triticum aestivum)--summer maize (Zea mays) double cropland and Kobresia humilis alpine meadow. The results showed that under the conditions of obtained data having good quality, nighttime ecosystem respiration from eddy covariance measurement was significantly agreed with that from static chamber/gas chromatogram measurement, with the correlation coefficients ranging from 0.95 to 0.98, and the daytime ecosystem respiration from these two measurements also had a good consistency though the static chamber/gas chromatogram measurement often produced higher values. The daily mean value of ecosystem respiration was significantly different between these two measurements, but the seasonal pattern was similar. For winter wheat-summer maize double cropland, the difference of mean air temperature inside and outside the chamber was 1.8 degrees C, and the daily mean value of ecosystem respiration across the whole study period was 30.3% lower in eddy covariance measurement than in static chamber/gas chromatogram measurement; while for alpine meadow, the difference of the mean air temperature was 1.9 degrees C, and the daily mean value of ecosystem respiration was 31.4% lower in eddy covariance measurement than in static chamber/gas chromatogram measurement. The variance between the daily mean values of ecosystem respiration obtained from the two measurements was higher in growing season than in dormant season.
Keywords:static chamber/gas chromatogram  eddy covariance  ecosystem respiration  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《应用生态学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号