Comparison of the results of stenting ans balloon angioplasty of coronary arteries in relation to the type of stenosis

Based on the comparison of the immediate and late results of stenting and balloon angioplasty (BA), the authors consider whether it is expedient to perform stenting of coronary arteries (CA) in all cases of BA in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and different types of CA stenosis. The study included 410 patients: a group of stenting (n = 197) and a group of traditional BA (n = 213). All the patients in both groups were divided into four subgroups in relation to the type of detected stenosis according to the classification of the American Association of Cardiologists (ACC/AHA). The positive angiographic and clinical results were observed in all 197 patients after stenting. This was associated neither with the type of dilated stenosis nor with the design of an implanted stent. In dilation of types A and B1 stenoses, a stent-like result was significantly more frequently observed than in dilation of types B2 and C stenoses. There was no significant difference in the development of restenosis in patients after routine BA and stenting of types A and B1 stenoses. At the same time, after BA of types B2 and C stenoses, restenosis developed significantly more frequently than in stenting. Thus, on the basis of this study, it may be stated that the traditional BA yields the so-called stent-like result significantly more frequently in patients with uncomplicated forms of CA stenoses than in those with complicated ones. Once the stent-like result is achieved in patients with type A stenoses, stenting should not be performed since the latter fails to improve the immediate and late results of angioplasty. Despite that the stent-like result is achieved in patients with complicated forms of CA stenoses, it is expedient to make stenting. Our findings indicate that the obtained good immediate result reduces the incidence of restenosis.