Reinterpretation of thecal plate homology and phylogeny in the Class Crinoidea

Since the Class Crinoidea was erected in 1821 there has been a consistent failure to resolve the phylogeny of this major group on even the coarsest scale. Reinterpretation of crinoid thecal plate homology, using the orientation of the stem rather than the position of the arms as a reference point for the theca, indicates that two-circlet (monocyclic) crinoids may be derived from three-circlet (dicyclic) taxa by the loss of any one of the three plate circlets in the theca rather than just the lowest circlet as has been assumed previously. Cladistic analysis utilizing this new homology, which is supported by evidence from ontogeny and from the position of other plates in the theca, suggests that Aethocrinus is sister group to all other crinoids and that the Cladida are primitive sister group to both the Disparida and Camerata. The Disparida, Hybocrinida and Perittocrinidae together represent a monophyletic clade. The Camerata also are monophyletic, but the orders Monobathrida and Diplobathrida can no longer be considered to represent natural taxa, with two-circlet camerates probably having evolved more than once. This reinterpretation of thecal plate homology sheds new light on the relationships between the major crinoid groups and the pattern of early crinoid evolution. □ Echinodermata, Crinoidea, homology, phylogeny.