Purification and Characterization of a NADPH-Dependent Aldehyde Reductase from Mung Bean That Detoxifies Eutypine, a Toxin from Eutypa lata

Eutypine (4-hydroxy-3-3-methyl-3-butene-1-ynyl] benzaldehyde) is a toxin produced by Eutypa lata, the causal agent of eutypa dieback in the grapevine (Vitis vinifera). Eutypine is enzymatically converted by numerous plant tissues into eutypinol (4-hydroxy-3-3-methyl-3-butene-1-ynyl] benzyl alcohol), a metabolite that is nontoxic to grapevine. We report a four-step procedure for the purification to apparent electrophoretic homogeneity of a eutypine-reducing enzyme (ERE) from etiolated mung bean (Vigna radiata) hypocotyls. The purified protein is a monomer of 36 kD, uses NADPH as a cofactor, and exhibits a K_m value of 6.3 μm for eutypine and a high affinity for 3- and 4-nitro-benzaldehyde. The enzyme failed to catalyze the reverse reaction using eutypinol as a substrate. ERE detoxifies eutypine efficiently over a pH range from 6.2 to 7.5. These data strongly suggest that ERE is an aldehyde reductase that could probably be classified into the aldo-keto reductase superfamily. We discuss the possible role of this enzyme in eutypine detoxification.Many pathogenic bacteria and fungi produce toxins that interfere with various functions of plant cells and may affect plant defense mechanisms (Durbin, 1981). Toxin production is commonly associated with disease severity and can be involved in colonization or systemic invasion by the pathogen (Schäfer, 1994). Toxin resistance has been shown in most cases to be based on the ability of the plant to metabolically detoxify pathogen toxins (Meeley and Walton, 1991; Zhang and Birch, 1997; Zweimuller et al., 1997). Few cloned toxin-resistance genes that encode proteins involved in detoxification mechanisms have been described (Utsumi et al., 1988; Johal and Briggs, 1992; Zhang and Birch, 1997). In many cases a relationship exists between toxin tolerance and resistance to the disease (Anzai et al., 1989; Meeley et al., 1992). The availability of toxin-resistance genes will permit a greater understanding of the mechanisms causing plant disease and will also set the stage for engineering resistance to plant disease (Keen, 1993).Eutypine (4-hydroxy-3-3-methyl-3-butene-1-ynyl] benzaldehyde) is a toxin produced by the ascomycete fungus Eutypa lata (Pers.: Fr.) Tul., the causal agent of eutypa dieback (Tey-Rulh et al., 1991). This disease is responsible for considerable loss in yield and is the most devastating disease of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) in many countries (Moller and Kasamitis, 1981; Munkvold et al., 1994). The fungus infects the stock through pruning wounds and is present in the xylem and phloem of the vine trunk and branches (Moller and Kasamitis, 1978; Duthie et al., 1991). After a long incubation period, a canker forms around the infected wound. The toxin synthesized by the fungus in the trunk is believed to be transported by the sap to the herbaceous parts of the vine (Fallot et al., 1997). Eutypine penetrates grapevine cells through passive diffusion and its accumulation in the cytoplasm has been explained by an ion-trapping mechanism related to the ionization state of the molecule (Deswarte et al., 1996b). In the cell the effects of eutypine include reduction of adenylated nucleotide content, inhibition of succinate dehydrogenase, uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation, and mitochondrial swelling (Deswarte et al., 1996a).Symptoms of eutypa dieback in the herbaceous part of the plant lead to dwarfed and withered new growth of branches, marginal necrosis of the leaves, dryness of the inflorescence, and, finally, death of one or more branches (Moller and Kasamitis, 1981). The toxin appears to be an important virulence factor involved in symptom development of the disease (Deswarte et al., 1996a). However, the absence of toxin-deficient mutants of the fungus and its long incubation period in the trunk before symptom development have prevented a critical study of the toxin in vine plants. Determining the gene responsible for eutypine resistance would therefore be an important critical tool in determining the role of eutypine toxin in symptom development in the disease; and it has the potential to confer resistance to transgenic grapevines.Recently, Colrat et al. (1998) found detoxification to occur in grapevine cells through the enzymatic reduction of eutypine into its corresponding alcohol, eutypinol (4-hydroxy-3-3-methyl-3-butene-1-ynyl] benzyl alcohol). We have determined that this derivative of the toxin is nontoxic for grapevine tissues. Furthermore, we have established a relationship between the susceptibility of grapevine to eutypa dieback and the ability of tissues to inactivate eutypine, suggesting that the detoxification mechanism plays an important role in defense reactions. Eutypine is enzymatically detoxified in numerous plant species and, among them, we found that the tissues of mung bean (Vigna radiata), a nonhost plant for the pathogen, exhibit an efficient detoxification activity. As a prerequisite for demonstrating the involvement of eutypine toxin in eutypa dieback, we report here the purification to homogeneity and the characterization of an ERE from etiolated mung bean hypocotyls.