NOO3D: A procedure to perform 3D species distribution models |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Faculty of Science, Universidad de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain;2. Computer Science Department, Fundición Building, 26310, Universidad de Vigo, Vigo, Spain;3. Biogeography and Global Change Departament, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), c/ José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain;1. Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain;2. Departamento de Informática, Edificio Fundición, Universidad de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain;3. Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Informática, Edificio Politécnico s/n, Campus As Lagoas, Universidad de Vigo, 32004 Orense, Spain;4. Departamento de Biogeografía y Cambio Global, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), c/ José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain |
| |
Abstract: | There is consensus surrounding the need to include a third dimension when estimating Species Distribution Models (SDMs), which is of special interest for marine species. Application of the third dimension is, however, rarely available, thus users are obliged to manually combine 2D SDM outputs (i.e., suitability or presence/absence maps) for 3D distribution generation. Herein, the Niche of Occurrence 3D (NOO3D) is presented, which is a new, simple modelling procedure that provides 3D distributions using both 3D occurrence samples and environmental datasets that consist of one layer per depth value. NOO3D performance was evaluated using five virtual marine species to avoid errors associated with real data sets (three pelagic species, with wide, medium, and narrow distributions, respectively, a mesopelagic species and an abyssal species). These virtual species are distributed across the North Atlantic Ocean and were built to a 0.5° x 0.5° resolution and considering 49 depth levels (from 0.43 m to an undersea depth of 5274.7 m). NOO3D results were also compared to those provided by 3D Alpha Shapes and Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt). The True Positive Rate (TPR), or sensitivity, True Negative Rate (TNR), or specificity, False Positive Rate (FPR), or commission error, and False Negative Rate (FNR), or omission error, were employed in order to facilitate comparison between methods. MaxEnt performed best for TPR, TSS and FNR, and Alpha Shape 3D performed best for FPR and TNR. NOO3D was always the second-ranked method for all metrics considered, which indicates that it was the most suitable method. The provided results indicate that NOO3D can be considered a viable alternative in achieving three-dimensional species distribution models. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|