The explanatory power of biogeographical patterns: a reply to de Bruyn et al |
| |
Authors: | Lynne R. Parenti Malte C. Ebach |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, , Washington, D.C., 20013‐7012 USA;2. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, , NSW 2052 Australia |
| |
Abstract: | Confusion between evidence and hypothesis in biogeographical studies was the focus of our recent Guest Editorial (Parenti & Ebach, 2013, Journal of Biogeography, 40 , 813–820). That editorial was critiqued by de Bruyn et al. (2013, Journal of Biogeography, doi: 10.1111/jbi.12166) to whom we reply briefly here. Despite our shared goals – to understand what lives where and why – we argue from different philosophical premises. Although we may have little common ground, such debate encourages the good health of the field of biogeography. |
| |
Keywords: | Biogeographical regions evidence hypothesis Indo‐Malaya Pandora Sulawesi |
|
|