首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

血凝抑制和病毒中和法在大流行流感疫苗临床血清学评价中的应用和比较
引用本文:李长贵,高强,刘书珍,刘瑜瑄,张建三,尹卫东,方捍华.血凝抑制和病毒中和法在大流行流感疫苗临床血清学评价中的应用和比较[J].微生物学免疫学进展,2007,35(4):25-27.
作者姓名:李长贵  高强  刘书珍  刘瑜瑄  张建三  尹卫东  方捍华
作者单位:1. 中国药品生物制品检定所,北京,100050
2. 北京科兴生物制品有限公司,北京,100085
摘    要:在大流行流感疫苗临床试验的免疫效果评价中,分别采用血凝抑制(HI)和病毒中和(VN)法检测血清中抗体滴度,并对结果进行比较。在中和试验中,分别以观察细胞病变法和血球凝集法确定中和法终点,两种方法得到的结果相近。376份血清(63.4%)以VN法和HI法检测获得结果相同。经统计学分析证明两种方法有很好的相关性,r值为0.85,HI 1∶40对应的VN滴度为1∶33。因此,在大流行流感疫苗免疫效果评价中,两种抗体检测方法有较好的一致性。

关 键 词:大流行流感疫苗  血凝抑制法  病毒中和法
文章编号:1005-5673(2007)04-0025-03
修稿时间:2007年5月8日

Application and comparison of hemagglutination inhibition and virus neutralization methods in serological evaluation of pandemic influenza vaccine
LI Chang-gui,GAO Qiang,LIU Shu-zhen,et al..Application and comparison of hemagglutination inhibition and virus neutralization methods in serological evaluation of pandemic influenza vaccine[J].Progress In Microbiology and Immunology,2007,35(4):25-27.
Authors:LI Chang-gui  GAO Qiang  LIU Shu-zhen  
Institution:1LI Chang-gui,2GAO Qiang,1LIU Shu-zhen,et al.
Abstract:Both hemagglutination inhibition(HI) and virus neutralization(VN) methods for determining the antibody titer were applied to evaluate the immunological efficacy of pandemic influenza vaccine and the results of two methods were compared.Cytopathic effect(CPE) observation and red blood hemagglutination(HA) were used to record VN endpoints and achieved similar results.Two kinds of detection methods showed excellent agreement in this study,with correlation factor of 0.85.Thus both methods can be used to evaluate the immunological efficacy of pandemic influenza vaccine.
Keywords:Pandemic influenza vaccine  Hemagglutination Inhibition  Virus neutralization
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号