首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


On the methodological weakness of 'the effective number of codons': a reply to Marashi and Najafabadi
Authors:Fuglsang Anders
Affiliation:The Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA. fchen@cdc.gov
Abstract:In a recent publication [Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 317 (2004) 957] it was proposed that the 'effective number of codons' (Nc) in a gene should be calculated by summing the individual amino acid Nc's using rounding whenever the codon homozygosities are lower than the reciprocal value of the number of members of the synonymous families. This led Marashi and Najafabadi to examine the consequences of individual re-adjustment when comparing observed Nc with the expected Nc under assumptions of no selection, and C=G and A=T [Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 324 (2004) 1]. Clearly, the present methodology has some weaknesses; in this work, I discuss these in relation to the observations by Marashi and Najafabadi, and finally an alternative method for the calculation of Nc is introduced with the purpose of eliminating the need for re-adjustments.
Keywords:Codon bias   Homozygosity   Resampling   Genetic code   Re-adjustment
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号