Essential Role of the SycP Chaperone in Type III Secretion of the YspP Effector

The Ysa type III secretion (T3S) system enhances gastrointestinal infection by Yersinia enterocolitica bv. 1B. One effector protein targeted into host cells is YspP, a protein tyrosine phosphatase. It was determined in this study that the secretion of YspP requires a chaperone, SycP. Genetic analysis showed that deletion of sycP completely abolished the secretion of YspP without affecting the secretion of other Ysps by the Ysa T3S system. Analysis of the secretion and translocation signals of YspP defined the first 73 amino acids to form the minimal region of YspP necessary to promote secretion and translocation by the Ysa T3S system. Function of the YspP secretion/translocation signals was dependent on SycP. Curiously, when YspP was constitutively expressed in Y. enterocolitica bv. 1B, it was recognized and secreted by the Ysc T3S system and the flagellar T3S system. In these cases, the first 21 amino acids were sufficient to promote secretion, and while SycP did enhance secretion, it was not essential. However, neither the Ysc T3S system nor the flagellar T3S system translocated YspP into mammalian cells. This supports a model where SycP confers secretion/translocation specificities for YspP by the Ysa T3S system. A series of biochemical approaches further established that SycP specifically interacts with YspP and protected YspP degradation in the cell prior to secretion. Collectively, the evidence suggests that YspP secretion by the Ysa T3S system is a posttranslational event.Many gram-negative bacteria have evolved sophisticated delivery systems termed type III secretion (T3S) systems to transport effector proteins into the cytosols of eukaryotic host cells (10, 21, 22). The translocated effectors manipulate host cell activities in various ways, thereby permitting the establishment of a pathogenic or symbiotic interaction (20). T3S systems are ancestrally related to the flagellar T3S system, having in common a basal body spanning the inner and outer bacterial membranes responsible for the appropriate selection of polypeptides delivered into a hollow channel leading out of the bacterium. At the outer surface, flagellar polypeptides travel the length of the adjoining hook and filament, but in T3S systems, the secreted polypeptides pass through a special hollow needle that extends away from the bacterium to the targeted host cell (10, 21, 22). Heterologous multimeric proteins localized to the tip of the needle form the translocon, a porelike channel that is assembled in the eukaryotic plasma membrane, enabling the injection of bacterial effectors (24, 48, 51).Two terminologies are distinctly used to describe protein transport by T3S systems. While “secretion” is a transport event for proteins from the bacterial cytosol into the extracellular milieu, “translocation” is a transport event for proteins from the bacterial cytosol into the eukaryotic host''s cytosol. Generally, secretion but not translocation is mediated by the first 20 amino acids of effector proteins (41, 46, 47), albeit mRNA sequences at the N terminus of some proteins have been also considered to function as the secretion signals (3, 44). This secretion event is independent of the presence of cognate effector chaperones (46, 59). Despite no conservation of the amino acids among the secretion signals, amphipathic or disordered secondary structures of the peptides are thought to function as the secretion signals recognized by the T3S apparatuses (22, 34, 35). In contrast, translocation usually requires both the secretion (the first 20 amino acids) and the translocation (amino acids 20 to 100) signals (46, 47, 59). This translocation event is efficiently mediated by the presence of the cognate chaperones (9, 14, 30), and the chaperone-effector complexes have been proposed to function as the three-dimensional signals recognized by the T3S apparatuses (5, 33, 38, 49, 50).Many T3S effectors employ cognate chaperones in the bacterial cytoplasm (43, 57). The effector chaperones have been categorized into two subgroups, class 1A and class 1B, primarily based on the substrate properties (and the gene locations) (13, 43). Class 1A chaperones commonly bind to one effector, and most of them are encoded by genes located adjacent to the gene encoding the cognate effectors. In contrast, class 1B chaperones bind to multiple effectors and are encoded by genes located within operons that code for structural components of the T3S apparatus that are distant to the cognate effector genes. Evolutionally, this subgroup of chaperones is thought to be an archetype of effector chaperones. Although T3S effector chaperones lack primary sequence similarity even in same subgroup, overall the effector chaperones whose three-dimensional structures are solved share similar folds, consisting of three α-helices and five β-strands (5, 36, 38, 49, 54). Similarly, effector chaperones share the common biochemical characteristics of acidic properties (pI 4 to 5) and low molecular masses (12 to 15 kDa), with a tendency to form homodimers (43). These homodimers recognize the chaperone binding domains (CBD) of the cognate effectors, which are usually located in the amino-terminal 20 to 100 amino acids (translocation signal) of the effector (19, 30, 59). Despite the wealth of information about individual chaperones, a universally accepted model for the mechanisms by which they promote secretion is lacking. One study shows that the guidance of chaperone-effector complexes toward the T3S apparatus is provided by the affinity of their chaperones to the ATPase of the T3S apparatus, whereby the ATPase releases the chaperones from the complexes and then unfolds the cognate effector for secretion (2). Several additional functions of T3S effector chaperones have been reported, including the prevention of effector aggregation prior to delivery to the secretion system, limitation of premature interactions, and protection of effectors from protease degradation in bacterial cells (17, 43). When an organism has multiple T3S pathways, as is the case for some Yersinia spp., there is the opportunity to gain new insight into how a given chaperone might influence T3S system specificity for substrates. Without direct testing of the aforementioned mechanistic models, the role of a chaperone in T3S and how it affects the overall sequence of pathogenic events is, at best, a conjecture.Highly virulent strains of Yersinia enterocolitica bv. 1B have a total of three T3S systems. The first T3S system (Ysc) is encoded by the virulence plasmid, and it secretes six effectors termed Yops. Ysc T3S is important for systemic infection (11, 12, 42). This T3S system is common to all Yersinia species pathogenic to humans, including another enteropathogen, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, and the plague pathogen Yersinia pestis. The second system (Ysa) is encoded by a cluster of genes mapping to the Ysa pathogenicity island (25, 53). The Ysa T3S system secretes a set of eight effectors termed Ysps and, interestingly, also secretes three Yops, YopE, YopN, and YopP/YopJ (39, 58, 61). This Ysa T3S system is restricted to clinical isolates of Y. enterocolitica bv. 1B and promotes the initial establishment of infection in gastrointestinal tissue (39, 55). The third T3S system is an integral part of the flagellum and secretes proteins termed Fops to the extracellular milieu (64).Previously, we identified the suite of Ysp proteins secreted by the Ysa T3S system (39). However, little is known about the detailed mechanism by which these proteins are secreted and translocated by this system. Among the Ysp proteins identified, YspP is a protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTPase) whose activity is required for full virulence (39). Here, we found a small open reading frame (ORF) immediately downstream of yspP and designated it sycP. The SycP protein was demonstrated to be a YspP-specific chaperone essential for both the secretion and the translocation of YspP by the Ysa T3S system. In addition, we also examined the secretion specificity requirements for YspP secretion by three different T3S systems as model cases. Interestingly, our data suggest that the mechanisms by which the secretion and translocation signals are recognized are different, depending on the type of T3S system examined.