首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Spines and epibionts as antipredator defenses in the thorny oyster Spondylus americanus Hermann
Institution:1. Environmental Chemistry Department, IDAEA-CSIC, Jordi Girona 18, 08034 Barcelona, Spain;2. PhD Program in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Paraná, 81531-980 Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil;3. Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences- IRBio, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain;4. Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias y Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Ambientes Sustentables (CIBAS), Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción, Chile;1. Department of Biology and Department of Life and Nanopharmaceutical Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 130-701, Republic of Korea;2. Department of Environmental Health Science, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Republic of Korea;3. Watershed Ecology Research Team, Water Environment Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 404-170, Republic of Korea
Abstract:Observations and experiments on the cemented pelecypod Spondylus americanus Hermann at Discovery Bay, Jamaica were made to identify the predators of this animal and learn whether their spines, or their epibionts, are important in deterring predation. Spine growth was studied also and found to be very rapid (≈ 1mm/day), and broken spines broken were repaired at this rate.The predators of Spondylus include the gastropod Fasciolaria tulipa Linnaeus (responsible for half of the observed predation), and various crushing predators, including the spiny lobster Panulirus argus (Latreille)], rays Aetobatis narinari (Euphrasen) and Dasyatus americanus Hildebrand], the porcupine fish (Diodon hystrix L.), and an unidentified stomatopod. Predators show an increased frequency of attacks in shallow water versus deep, and probably account for the scarcity of Spondylus americanus above −15 m.The concealment effect of epifauna was found to be more important than spines as an antipredator defense. Removal of spines and epibionts significantly increased levels of mortality only when both features were manipulated. There was no statistically significant increase in predation following the removal of epibionts because the shells were rapidly grown over by sponges. Spines alone do not appear to deter predators, but probably serve to attract epibionts and extend them beyond the more vulnerable shell margin. These results do not support the view that spondylid spines evolved as structural deterrents to predators. I argue that they most likely evolved to attract other organisms to settle on the shell and conceal it from predators.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号