Signal Intensities in Preoperative MRI Do Not Reflect Proliferative Activity in Meningioma

BACKGROUND: Identification of high-grade meningiomas in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is important for optimized surgical strategy and best possible resection. Numerous studies investigated subjectively determined morphological features as predictors of tumor biology in meningiomas. The aim of this study was to identify the predictive value of more reliable, quantitatively measured signal intensities in MRI for differentiation of high- and low-grade meningiomas and identification of meningiomas with high proliferation rates, respectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients (56 World Health Organization [WHO] grade I, 9 WHO grade II, and 1 WHO grade I) were included in the study. Preoperative MRI signal intensities (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR], T1 precontrast, and T1 postcontrast as genuine and normalized values) were correlated with Ki-67 expression in tissue sections of resected meningiomas. Differences between the groups (analysis of variance) and Spearman rho correlation were computed using SPSS 22. RESULTS: Mean values of genuine signal intensities of meningiomas in FLAIR, T1 native, and T1 postcontrast were 323.9 ± 59, 332.8 ± 67.9, and 768.5 ± 165.3. Mean values of normalized (to the contralateral white matter) signal intensities of meningiomas in FLAIR, T1 native, and T1 postcontrast were 1.5 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 0.1, and 1.9 ± 0.4. There was no significant correlation between MRI signal intensities and WHO grade or Ki-67 expression. Signal intensities did not differ significantly between WHO grade I and II/III meningiomas. Ki-67 expression was significantly increased in high-grade meningiomas compared with low-grade meningiomas (P < 0.01). Objectively measured values of MRI signal intensities (FLAIR, T1 precontrast, and T1 postcontrast enhancement) did not distinguish between high-grade and low-grade meningiomas. Furthermore, there was no association between MRI signal intensities and Ki-67 expression representing proliferative activity.Meningiomas are among the most common brain tumors. Their incidence is about 1%, and they account for almost one third of all primary intracranial masses. The majority of meningiomas are very slowly growing and nonsymptomatic or minimally symptomatic entities, discovered as incidental findings on neuroimaging [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification system distinguishes 3 histological grades and 15 subtypes and is a well-accepted tool for prediction of prognosis. Although most meningiomas are benign masses, certain histological subtypes reveal very high recurrence rates despite the tumors’ seemingly total removal. Grade II (atypical) and grade III (anaplastic) meningiomas are associated with an increased risk of recurrence, are more aggressive, and show invasive behavior [2]. Grade I meningiomas are generally considered as benign tumors, but recent studies indicate substantial neurological deficits and impaired long-term survival due to tumor recurrence and stroke despite their low histopathological grading in a considerable proportion of cases [3], [4]. Increased mitotic activity (more than 4 mitoses per 10 high-power fields) and elevated Ki-67 expression (Ki-67 index of more than 5% of nuclei) are reliable histopathological markers for tumor recurrence [2].Because histopathological grading alone does not predict outcome satisfyingly, numerous studies investigated the value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prognostics. For example, Liu et al. demonstrated that hyperintensity on diffusion-weighted imaging, heterogeneous gadolinium enhancement, disruption of the arachnoid at brain tumor interface, T2 hyperintense peritumoral edema, and irregular tumor shape were independent predictors of non–grade I meningioma [5]. Other works produced comparable results, although some of these studies underline the importance of positive capsular enhancement [6], [7], whereas others emphasize the predictive value of peritumoral edema [5], [8]. All the above-cited works investigated morphological features of meningiomas summarized in subjective scoring systems, but not one of the studies objectively analyzed values of SIs in commonly used preoperative MRI sequences.Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of genuine and normalized SIs of standardized preoperative MRI (T1 pre- and postcontrast, T2, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR]) as in vivo predictors of proliferative activity of meningiomas.