首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

金沙江上段浮游藻类和着生藻类群落格局及其与环境因子的关系比较研究
引用本文:胡建成,宋志斌,周佳诚,谭路,唐涛. 金沙江上段浮游藻类和着生藻类群落格局及其与环境因子的关系比较研究[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(2): 590-599
作者姓名:胡建成  宋志斌  周佳诚  谭路  唐涛
作者单位:中国科学院水生生物研究所, 淡水生态与生物技术国家重点实验室, 武汉 430072;中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;中国科学院水生生物研究所, 淡水生态与生物技术国家重点实验室, 武汉 430072;西藏大学理学院, 拉萨 850000
基金项目:生态环境部生物多样性调查评估项目(2019HJ2096001006); 国家自然科学基金项目(32071589)
摘    要:比较河流浮游藻类和着生藻类群落的时空格局及其与环境因子关系的差异,有助于了解两类藻的区别与联系。然而,目前这方面的研究还不多。基于2019年秋季和2020年夏季金沙江上段干流17个样点藻类及水体理化指标的调查数据,分析了不同季节浮游藻类和着生藻类群落结构及其主要环境驱动因子,比较了两类藻的多样性格局及其与环境关系的异同。结果发现,调查河段的浮游藻类和着生藻类均以硅藻为主,其中浮游藻类以极小曲壳藻(Achnanthes minutissima)、钝脆杆藻(Fragilaria capucina)、适中舟形藻(Navicula accomoda)为主要优势种,着生藻类以极小曲壳藻(Achnanthes minutissima)、扁圆卵形藻(Cocconeis placentula)、橄榄绿色异极藻(Gomphonema olivaceum)为主要优势种。浮游藻类和着生藻类秋季平均密度分别为:2.41×10~5个/L、9.43×10~3个/cm~2,均明显高于夏季的平均密度(4.84×10~4个/L、4.84×10~3个/cm~2)。两类藻的群落格局表现出明显的季节变化,但只有着生藻分类单元...

关 键 词:河流  藻类  生物多样性  空间格局  季节动态
收稿时间:2021-02-08
修稿时间:2021-07-21

Comparative study on planktonic and periphytic algal community patterns and their relationships with environmental variables in the upper reaches of the Jinsha River
HU Jiancheng,SONG Zhibin,ZHOU Jiacheng,TAN Lu,TANG Tao. Comparative study on planktonic and periphytic algal community patterns and their relationships with environmental variables in the upper reaches of the Jinsha River[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(2): 590-599
Authors:HU Jiancheng  SONG Zhibin  ZHOU Jiacheng  TAN Lu  TANG Tao
Affiliation:State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China;College of Science, Tibet University, Lhasa 850000, China
Abstract:Algae are main primary producers in streams and rivers, and they can be classified as planktonic or periphytic algae based on their living forms. In the same river, planktonic and periphytic algae mainly live in different habitats, where they may transform each other through settling or resuspension and compete for important resources. Comparing spatio-temporal patterns of lotic planktonic and periphytic algae and their relationships with environmental factors may be helpful for us to understand correlations between these two types of algal assemblages. However, such research is still limited. In this study, we surveyed planktonic and periphytic algae and physico-chemical variables from the upper reaches of the Jinsha River in the autumn of 2019 and the summer of 2020. We compared seasonal differences in community structures of planktonic and periphytic algae by using Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) and Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) and identified physico-chemical variables that were important to algal patterns by using BIO-ENV analysis and Mantel test. We found that both planktonic and periphytic algal assemblages were dominated by diatoms, in which Achnanthes minutissima, Fragilaria capucina and Navicula accomoda were dominant in planktonic algae, and Achnanthes minutissima, Cocconeis placentula, and Gomphonema olivaceum were dominant in periphytic algae. The average densities of planktonic and periphytic algae in the autumn were 2.41×105 ind./L and 9.43×103 ind./cm2, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the summer (4.84×104 ind./L, 4.84×103 ind./cm2). Although both types of algae exhibited significantly seasonal differences in community compositions, only periphytic algae had significantly seasonal differences in richness. The physical and chemical variables that significantly correlated with planktonic algal assemblages kept relatively consistent between seasons, including total nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen and elevation. In contrast, environmental driving forces for periphytic algal patterns were seasonal-specific with elevation and silicate in the autumn, and total nitrogen, pH and chemical oxygen demand in the summer. Correlation between periphytic algal assemblages and physico-chemical variables was higher in both seasons when compared with that of planktonic algae. Meanwhile, the geographical distance also had significant effects on spatial patterns of algal assemblages. However, when geographic effects were controlled, community patterns of both types of algae were only significantly related to environmental distance in the summer. Our study highlights associations and differences between lotic planktonic and periphytic algal assemblages. Base on the finding that periphytic algae had more significantly seasonal dynamic and were more sensitive to environmental changes, we suggested that periphytic algae might be used as routine bio-indicators for monitoring and assessing of ecological conditions of streams and rivers.
Keywords:river  algae  biodiversity  spatial pattern  seasonal dynamics
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号