Microcosm studies on control of aphids by generalist arthropod predators: Effects of alternative prey

Generalist predators are potential controlagents of aphids in cereal fields. Becauseaphids are low-quality prey for most generalistpredators, the availability of alternativehigh-quality prey may influence theinteractions between aphids and their predatorsby reducing the predation rate due to loweredpreference for aphids. We analysed this bytesting the ability of six generalist predators(the spiders Erigone atra (Bl.), Clubiona lutescens (Westr.)/reclusaO.P.-C., Pachygnatha degeeri Sundevall,Pardosa prativaga (L.Koch), the carabidbeetle Bembidion lampros (Herbst), andthe harvestman Oligolophus tridens (C.L.Koch)) to suppress Rhopalosiphum padi(Linné) populations in the presence orabsence of alternative prey types (fruit fliesDrosophila melanogaster (Meigen) or thecollembolan Tomocerus bidentatus(Folsom)). Experiments of 10 days duration werecarried out in a microcosm set-up. Withoutalternative prey all predators except B.lampros were able to reduce aphid populationdevelopment significantly relative topredator-free controls. The harvest spider O. tridens was the most efficient predator(<90% reduction). Presence of alternativeprey (fruit flies) had a significant negativeeffect on aphid limitation by P. prativagaand a weak positive effect in B. lampros, but did not influence the ability to reduce aphids in E. atra, Clubiona, P. degeeri and O. tridens. In addition, 24-hours' consumption experiments with adult P. degeeri and subadult C. lutescens/reclusa, using R. padi and D. melanogaster as prey types, showed markedly lower consumption rates of aphid than of fruit fly prey. The microcosm arrangement is a simple way to partly simulate the habitat complexity of an agricultural field under laboratory conditions and proved to be a useful tool for investigating complex predator-prey interactions.