首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Adapting the LCA framework to environmental assessment in land planning
Authors:Eléonore Loiseau  Philippe Roux  Guillaume Junqua  Pierre Maurel  Véronique Bellon-Maurel
Affiliation:1. AgroParisTech ENGREF, 19 avenue du Maine, 75732, Paris cedex 15, France
2. Irstea, UMR ITAP, ELSA (Environmental Lifecycle and Sustainability Assessment), 361 rue Jean-Fran?ois Breton, BP5095, 34196, Montpellier cedex 5, France
3. Ecole des Mines d’Alès, LGEI, ELSA (Environmental Lifecycle and Sustainability Assessment), 6 avenue de Clavières, 30319, Alès, France
4. Irstea, UMR TETIS, 361 rue Jean-Fran?ois Breton, BP5095, 34196, Montpellier cedex 5, France
Abstract:

Purpose

Since the implementation of the European directive (EC/2001/42) on strategic environmental assessment, an ex ante evaluation has become mandatory for plans and programs. This requirement could have significant consequences for the environment. Local authorities, who are in charge of land planning issues, must therefore conduct such assessments. However, they are faced with lack of uniform methodology. The aim of this paper is thus to propose a methodological framework for the required environmental assessment stages in land planning.

Methods

Life cycle assessment (LCA) has been identified as a promising tool to perform environmental assessment at a meso-level (i.e., territories). Yet, the standardized LCA framework has never been used for assessing the environmental impacts of a territory as such, which can be explained by the complexity that its application would involve. Four major methodological bottlenecks have been identified in this paper, i.e., (1) functional unit definition, (2) boundary selection, (3) data collecting, and (4) the refinement of the life cycle impact assessment phase in order to provide useful indicators for land planning. For each of these challenges, recommendations have been made to adapt the analytical framework of LCA.

Results and discussion

A revised framework is proposed to perform LCA of a territory. One of the major adaptations needed concerns the goal and scope definition phase. Henceforth, the association of a territory and the studied land planning scenario, defined by its geographical boundaries and its interactions with other territories, will be designated as the reference flow in LCA. Consequently, two kinds of indicators will be determined using this approach, i.e., (1) a vector of environmental impacts generated (conventional LCA) and (2) a vector of land use functions provided by the territory for different stakeholders (e.g., provision of work, recreation, culture, etc.). This revised framework has been applied to a theoretical case study in order to highlight its utility in land planning.

Conclusions

This work is a first step in the adaptation of the LCA framework to environmental assessment in land planning. We believe that this revised framework has the potential to provide relevant information in decision-making processes. Nonetheless, further work is still needed to broaden and deepen this approach (i.e., normalization of impacts and functions, coupled application with GIS, uncertainties, etc.).
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号