首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


The art and science of multi-scale citizen science support
Authors:Greg Newman  Jim Graham  Alycia Crall  Melinda Laituri
Institution:1. Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA;2. Earthwatch Institute, Allston, MA 02134, USA;3. University of New Hampshire, Cooperative Extension, Durham, NH 03824-2500, USA;4. University of Maine, Department of Communication and Journalism, Orono, ME 04469, USA;5. University College London, WC1E 6BT London, UK;6. UC Davis, School of Education, Davis, CA 95616, USA;7. Department of Community Sustainability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA;8. Center for Open Science, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA;9. Conservation Biology Institute, Corvallis, OR 97333, USA;2. Earthwatch Institute, Boston, MA, United States;3. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, United States;4. Earthwatch Institute, Oxford, United Kingdom;5. College of Liberal Arts (CoLA), Bath Spa University, Bath, United Kingdom;6. NORDECO, Copenhagen, Denmark;11. Departamento de Hidráulica e Saneamento, Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Trabalhador São-Carlense, São Carlos, Brazil;12. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile and Director of Kauyeken, Santiago, Chile;8. A Rocha Kenya, Watamu, Kenya;10. Kew Madagascar Conservation Center, Antananarivo, Madagascar
Abstract:Citizen science and community-based monitoring programs are increasing in number and breadth, generating volumes of scientific data. Many programs are ill-equipped to effectively manage these data. We examined the art and science of multi-scale citizen science support, focusing on issues of integration and flexibility that arise for data management when programs span multiple spatial, temporal, and social scales across many domains. Our objectives were to: (1) briefly review existing citizen science approaches and data management needs; (2) propose a framework for multi-scale citizen science support; (3) develop a cyber-infrastructure to support citizen science program needs; and (4) describe lessons learned. We find that approaches differ in scope, scale, and activities and that the proposed framework situates programs while guiding cyber-infrastructure system development. We built a cyber-infrastructure support system for citizen science programs (www.citsci.org) and show that carefully designed systems can be adept enough to support programs at multiple spatial and temporal scales across many domains when built with a flexible architecture. The advantage of a flexible, yet controlled, cyber-infrastructure system lies in the ability of users with different levels of permission to easily customize the features themselves, while adhering to controlled vocabularies necessary for cross-discipline comparisons and meta-analyses. Program evaluation tied to this framework and integrated into cyber-infrastructure support systems will improve our ability to track effectiveness. We compare existing systems and discuss the importance of standards for interoperability and the challenges associated with system maintenance and long-term support. We conclude by offering a vision of the future of citizen science data management and cyber-infrastructure support.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号