Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the gulf of Maine area |
| |
Authors: | DAVID A. COLSON DR. PEGGY HOYLE |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene &2. MacRae, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., USA |
| |
Abstract: | The compulsory dispute settlement regime included in the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention is recognized as one of the most comprehensive in a modern international convention. Yet, in the recent application of this regime, the question has arisen as to whether the procedural prerequisites associated with the LOS Convention's compulsory dispute settlement mechanism are so arduous as to avoid binding and compulsory jurisdiction in most instances. This article addresses that question by examining, in particular, the reasoning of the Southern Bluefin Tuna arbitration tribunal, which found Article 281 of Section 1 of the LOS Convention to bar jurisdiction to the compulsory dispute settlement mechanism prescribed by the Convention, and offers suggestions as to how states might distinguish or overcome the barriers imposed by the Southern Bluefin Tuna tribunal in future cases. |
| |
Keywords: | international law law of the sea offshore abandonment total/partial removal |
|
|