首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Assessment of regional and local biodiversity in tropical and subtropical coastal habitats in the East African Marine Ecoregion
Authors:Natalie Barnes  Roger N Bamber  Graham Bennell  Nils Cornelius  David Glassom  Sophie Conroy-Dalton Henderson  Narriman Jiddawi  Christine N W Lee  Adriano Macia  Daudi J Msangameno  Jos�� Paula  Saleh Yahya  Timothy J Ferrero
Institution:1. Zoology Department, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK
5. Oceanographic Research Institute, The South African Association for Marine Biological Research, P.O. Box 10712, Marine Parade, Durban, 4056, South Africa
6. School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
2. Institute of Marine Sciences, University of Dar es Salaam, P.O. Box 668, Zanzibar, Tanzania
3. Departamento de Ci??ncias Biol??gicas, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, CP 257, Maputo, Mozambique
4. Centro de Oceanografia, Laborat??rio Mar??timo da Guia, Faculdade de Ci??ncias da Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Nossa Senhora do Cabo 939, 2750-374, Cascais, Portugal
Abstract:The transboundary networks of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) project, TRANSMAP, assessed local turnover and regional biodiversity across the East African Marine Ecoregion, where inter-governmental co-operation has been working to connect local MPAs. The benthic fauna in the three most dominant habitats on this coastline??beaches, mangroves and seagrasses??were studied in two Regions (Northern Region, 10?C13°S; Southern Region, 25?C28°S). Meiofaunal taxa were used as the model faunal group owing to their diversity and abundance across habitat types and environmental conditions. Meiofaunal abundance averaged 2,500 individuals 10 cm?2 and was generally higher in mangrove and seagrass sediments than on the beaches, and was significantly different between habitats × Regions. In total, 18 taxa were recorded with highest diversity in the beach samples. Diversity indices and assemblage structure were significantly different between habitats, but also Regions. Specific granulometric 1?? size classes, shore-height and number of rain days were the factors most significantly correlating with the observed assemblage patterns. Additionally, the size of a MPA and latitude (which correlated with MPA age, but not number of rain days), were the factors fitting best with meiofaunal assemblage patterns across the beaches, the habitat for which the most comprehensive data were generated. Sample diversity was higher in the Southern Region, and although within- and across-habitats diversity were similar across the Regions, the two Regions appeared to provide complementary habitats and supported different assemblages. Within the Regions, beaches (the only habitat for which more than one location was sampled) were significantly different between Locations, supporting the establishment of multiple protected locations of the same habitat within each transboundary MPA.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号