Immunization of sheep against infection with larvae of the blowfly Lucilia cuprina |
| |
Authors: | V M Bowles P R Carnegie R M Sandeman |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt;2. Department of Clinical Pharmacy Research, Institute for Research and Medical Consultation, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia;1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion, Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan, 030001, PR China;2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, PR China |
| |
Abstract: | Sheep were repeatedly exposed to a second stage excretory-secretory antigen preparation of Lucilia cuprina by intradermal injection (S group) or intranasal aerosol (I group) in an attempt to induce immunity to the larvae. Hypersensitivity responses to the injections were monitored and correlated with larval numbers at subsequent challenge. Intradermal injections showed that the immediate or IgE-mediated and the intermediate or Arthus response were the major skin hypersensitivity reactions to the larval antigens. At challenge there was no significant reduction in larval numbers between the S and the control group, however the Arthus reaction did show some correlation with larval recoveries in the S group. There was a significant reduction in larval numbers (P < 0.005 Mann-Whitney U Test) between the I and the control group. In addition, the animals which showed respiratory hypersensitivity to the aerosol during the immunization period had the lowest larval recoveries. The results of a second challenge in the I group did not show continued protection. It is suggested that the protective response was suppressed by exposure to antigens at the first challenge infection. Exudate samples recovered during the infection were analysed for protein amount and the results were correlated with larval survival. They suggested that two separate mechanisms of resistance are operating in this experiment. The first occurs early in the infection, is probably associated with immediate hypersensitivity, and may control the initiation of protein leakage. The second occurs later in the infection and may result in the leakage of proteins able to control larval survival. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|