Phytoplankton–zooplankton seasonal timing and the 'clear-water phase' in some English lakes

SUMMARY 1. An examination is made of the relative seasonal timing of the postwinter increase of phytoplankton and zooplankton populations in four English lake basins. It centres upon weekly sampling over 20 years and rough counts of larger Crustacea, as copepods and cladocerans, from filtered samples that were used for chlorophyll a (Chl) estimation. 2. Typically, a spring maximum of phytoplankton, dominated by diatoms and earlier in the shallower lakes, is accompanied or followed by a maximum of copepods and then one of cladocerans dominated by the Daphnia hyalina–galeata complex. Regarding timing, the maximum of copepods has no apparent relation with phytoplankton abundance (Chl). The maximum of cladocerans appears to be largely independent of variation in the phytoplankton maximum, but is generally associated with a minimum in Chl. Evidence for some direct causality in this inverse correlation after the spring phytoplankton maximum is best displayed by the shallow Esthwaite Water in which the peaks of Chl and cladocerans are separated further than in the deep Windermere basins where phytoplankton growth is delayed. In Esthwaite Water, and possibly often in Windermere, a principal minimum in Chl is ascribable to grazing by Daphnia. 3. The typical inverse relationship of Chl and cladocerans is lost in some years when relatively inedible large phytoplankters (e.g. colonial chrysomonads, filamentous cyanophytes) are abundant and Chl minima are less pronounced, although maxima of cladocerans still occur. Conversely, available edible phytoplankters include various small forms grouped as μ‐algae and Cryptomonas spp.; their probable depletions by Daphnia appear to be sequential and may limit the latter's maxima, whose inception is temperature‐dependent. 4. The spring–summer maxima of cladocerans and minima of Chl are generally coincident with a main seasonal maximum of Secchi disc transparency and light penetration – to which removal of non‐phytoplankton particles by filtering cladocerans may contribute.