Comparison of vasodilator potency of adrenomedulling and proadrenomedullin N-terminal 20 peptide in human

Adrenomedullin (ADM) and proadrenomedullin N-terminal peptide (PAMP), both of which are derived from preproadrenomedullin, are reported to have a potent hypotensive effect in animals. However, no data are available concerning the vasodilatory potency of PAMP or comparing this potency to that of ADM in human vasculature. We examined the effects of intra-arterial infusion of graded doses of ADM (1.25, 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 pmol/min per 100 ml of tissue) and PAMP (125, 250, 500, 750 and 1000 pmol/min per 100 ml of tissue) on total forearm blood flow and forearm skin blood flow in 11 healthy subjects. ADM increased total forearm blood flow from 2.9 +/- 0.4 to 8.6 +/- 1.1 ml/min per 100 ml (p < 0.01), and skin blood flow from 0.07 +/- 0.02 to 0.14 +/- 0.03 volts (p < 0.01). In contrast to this potent vasodilatory effect, a significant rise in forearm skeletal blood flow was seen only in response to the maximum dose of PAMP (from 2.7 +/- 0.5 to 5.3 +/- 1.0 ml/min per 100 ml; p < 0.01). In addition, PAMP had no significant vasoactive effect on skin blood flow (from 0.06 +/- 0.02 to 0.09 +/- 0.03 volts; NS). In conclusion, the skeletal muscle vasodilator potency of PAMP is less than one hundredth of that of ADM in human forearm. Given its weak dilator potency, it seems unlikely that PAMP alone could significantly regulate resistance vessel tone as a circulating hormone in humans.