A thirty percent increase in UV-B has no impact on photosynthesis in well-watered and droughted pea plants in the field |
| |
Authors: | D. J. Allen,&dagger ,S. Nogué s,J. I. L. Morison,P. D. Greenslade,&dagger ,A. R. Mcleod&dagger § , N. R. Baker |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex, CO4 3SQ, UK,;Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, Cambs., PE17 2LS, UK, Present addresses: ‡Agricultural Research Service, Photosynthesis Research Unit, Urbana, Illinois 61801–3838, USA,;Centre for the Study of Environmental Change and Sustainability, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JL, UK |
| |
Abstract: | It has been suggested that field experiments which increase UV-B irradiation by a fixed amount irrespective of ambient light conditions (‘square-wave’), may overestimate the response of photosynthesis to UV-B irradiation. In this study, pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants were grown in the field and subjected to a modulated 30% increase in ambient UK summer UV-B radiation (weighted with an erythemal action spectrum) and a mild drought treatment. UV-A and ambient UV control treatments were also studied. There were no significant effects of the UV-B treatment on the in situ CO2 assimilation rate throughout the day or on the light-saturated steady-state photosynthesis. This was confirmed by an absence of UV-B effects on the major components contributing to CO2 assimilation; photosystem II electron transport, ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate regeneration, ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase carboxylation, and stomatal conductance. In addition to the absence of an effect on photosynthetic activities, UV-B had no significant impact on plant biomass, leaf area or partitioning. UV-B exposure increased leaf flavonoid content. The UV-A treatment had no observable effect on photosynthesis or productivity. Mild drought resulted in reduced biomass, a change in partitioning away from shoots to roots whilst maintaining leaf area, but had no observable effect on photosynthetic competence. No UV-B and drought treatment interactions were observed on photosynthesis or plant biomass. In conclusion, a 30% increase in UV-B had no effects on photosynthetic performance or productivity in well-watered or droughted pea plants in the field. |
| |
Keywords: | biomass drought photosynthesis Pisum sativum ultraviolet-A ultraviolet-B |
|
|