首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Differential white blood cell count and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional and prospective studies
Authors:Gkrania-Klotsas Effrossyni  Ye Zheng  Cooper Andrew J  Sharp Stephen J  Luben Robert  Biggs Mary L  Chen Liang-Kung  Gokulakrishnan Kuppan  Hanefeld Markolf  Ingelsson Erik  Lai Wen-An  Lin Shih-Yi  Lind Lars  Lohsoonthorn Vitool  Mohan Viswanathan  Muscari Antonio  Nilsson Goran  Ohrvik John  Chao Qiang Jiang  Jenny Nancy Swords  Tamakoshi Koji  Temelkova-Kurktschiev Theodora  Wang Ya-Yu  Yajnik Chittaranjan Sakerlal  Zoli Marco  Khaw Kay-Tee  Forouhi Nita G  Wareham Nicholas J  Langenberg Claudia
Affiliation:MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Abstract:

Objective

Biological evidence suggests that inflammation might induce type 2 diabetes (T2D), and epidemiological studies have shown an association between higher white blood cell count (WBC) and T2D. However, the association has not been systematically investigated.

Research Design and Methods

Studies were identified through computer-based and manual searches. Previously unreported studies were sought through correspondence. 20 studies were identified (8,647 T2D cases and 85,040 non-cases). Estimates of the association of WBC with T2D were combined using random effects meta-analysis; sources of heterogeneity as well as presence of publication bias were explored.

Results

The combined relative risk (RR) comparing the top to bottom tertile of the WBC count was 1.61 (95% CI: 1.45; 1.79, p = 1.5*10−18). Substantial heterogeneity was present (I2 = 83%). For granulocytes the RR was 1.38 (95% CI: 1.17; 1.64, p = 1.5*10−4), for lymphocytes 1.26 (95% CI: 1.02; 1.56, p = 0.029), and for monocytes 0.93 (95% CI: 0.68; 1.28, p = 0.67) comparing top to bottom tertile. In cross-sectional studies, RR was 1.74 (95% CI: 1.49; 2.02, p = 7.7*10−13), while in cohort studies it was 1.48 (95% CI: 1.22; 1.79, p = 7.7*10−5). We assessed the impact of confounding in EPIC-Norfolk study and found that the age and sex adjusted HR of 2.19 (95% CI: 1.74; 2.75) was attenuated to 1.82 (95% CI: 1.45; 2.29) after further accounting for smoking, T2D family history, physical activity, education, BMI and waist circumference.

Conclusions

A raised WBC is associated with higher risk of T2D. The presence of publication bias and failure to control for all potential confounders in all studies means the observed association is likely an overestimate.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号