Involvement of Ureides in Nitrogen Fixation Inhibition in Soybean

The sensitivity of N₂ fixation to drought stress in soybean (Glycine max Merr.) has been shown to be associated with high ureide accumulation in the shoots, which has led to the hypothesis that N₂ fixation during drought is decreased by a feedback mechanism. The ureide feedback hypothesis was tested directly by measuring the effect of 10 mm ureide applied by stem infusion or in the nutrient solution of hydroponically grown plants on acetylene reduction activity (ARA). An almost complete inhibition of ARA was observed within 4 to 7 d after treatment, accompanied by an increase in ureide concentration in the shoot but not in the nodules. The inhibition of ARA resulting from ureide treatments was dependent on the concentration of applied ureide. Urea also inhibited ARA but asparagine resulted in the greatest inhibition of nodule activity. Because ureides did not accumulate in the nodule upon ureide treatment, it was concluded that they were not directly inhibitory to the nodules but that their influence mediated through a derivative compound, with asparagine being a potential candidate. Ureide treatment resulted in a continual decrease in nodule permeability to O₂ simultaneous with the inhibition of nitrogenase activity during a 5-d treatment period, although it was not clear whether the latter phenomenon was a consequence or a cause of the decrease in the nodule permeability to O₂.The physiological basis of N₂ fixation inhibition by water deficits in legume nodules is not clearly understood. A potential physiological basis for this water-deficit sensitivity may be that drought stress decreases the P_o (Weisz et al., 1985), as has been shown with other stresses such as temperature, salinity, or nitrate (Hunt and Layzell, 1993; Serraj et al., 1994; Denison and Harter, 1995). The role of O₂ limitation in the response of nitrogenase activity to drought stress has been discussed extensively (Diaz del Castillo and Layzell, 1995; Purcell and Sinclair, 1995; Serraj and Sinclair, 1996b; Serraj et al., 1999). However, the mechanisms by which drought affects P_o have not been elucidated. It is not clear whether drought stress has a direct effect on P_o, or whether the decrease in P_o is a consequence of a decrease in nodule activity.An alternative explanation for the decrease in nitrogenase activity under drought could be a feedback mechanism involving the accumulation of N compounds. Pate et al. (1969) proposed that lower rates of water movement out of the nodule during drought stress may restrict export of products of N₂ fixation, and the accumulation of these products would inhibit nitrogenase activity. Others have suggested that N₂ fixation in legumes might be regulated by a feedback mechanism involving N metabolism and the pool of reduced N in the plant (Silsbury et al., 1986; Parsons et al., 1993; Hartwig et al., 1994). Oti-Boateng and Silsbury (1993) reported an inhibition of nitrogenase activity in fava bean after plant uptake of Asn or Gln.Soybean (Glycine max Merr.) usually exports more than 80% of the N compounds out of the nodules in the form of the ureides Aln and Alac. They are transported in the xylem to the shoots, where they are catabolized (Winkler et al., 1987). High accumulation of petiole ureides has been measured during the inhibition of N₂ fixation by drought in both controlled (de Silva et al., 1996; Serraj and Sinclair, 1996a) and field (Purcell et al., 1998) environments. Furthermore, in a comparison of grain legume species, Sinclair and Serraj (1995) reported that those species exporting ureides from the nodules had N₂ fixation that was drought sensitive. Those species that exported little or no ureide had N₂ fixation that was relatively drought tolerant.An important possibility is that the accumulation of ureides in soybean nodules under soil-water deficits might trigger a feedback mechanism that results in decreased N₂ fixation activity (Sinclair and Serraj, 1995; Serraj et al., 1999). This paper reports a series of experiments to investigate the hypothesis of a ureide feedback inhibition of N₂ fixation in soybean. First, ureide levels were measured in plant tissue (nodules, roots, and shoots) upon the imposition of water deficits to confirm that ureide levels increased in the nodules themselves, and not just in the shoot. Second, the influence of ureides on nodule activity was examined by introducing ureides, along with other compounds, into soybean plants. These experiments were designed to examine the time course of the response and to determine the concentration response. Third, data were collected to determine if P_o and the response of N₂ fixation to pO₂ were also sensitive to introduced ureides.