Whitefish stocking in acidified lakes: ecological and physiological responses

In autumn 1986, six small lakes at different stages of acidification were stocked with one-summer-old whitefish, Coregonus pallasi Valenciennes 1848, in order to see whether whitefish stocking would be a suitable method for the mitigation of acidification effects. In two of the lakes the introduction was a complete failure: the whitefish did not survive, evidently due to high acidity and high aluminium concentrations of the lake waters. In one of the most acidified lakes (pH 4.3–4.8, Al_lab 29–125 g 1^–1) and in two less acidic lakes (pH 5.0–5.2 and 5.4–6.4), introduction was successful. Three years after the introduction, the mean weights of the fish in those three lakes were 580, 250 and 360 g respectively, with the weight and also the condition factor of stocked whitefish being highest in the most acidified lake. In that lake there were few or no fish present during the introduction, whereas in the less acid lakes there were dense populations of perch and therefore a potential interspecific competition for food. Different availability of food in the lakes was presumed to be the main reason for the growth differences. Plasma Na⁺ and Cl^– concentrations of whitefish were lower in the acidic lakes than in the lake with pH around 6 three years after stocking. This suggests that, despite the good growth and highest condition factor of whitefish in the most acid lake, the fish still experienced some acid stress.