Outcomes associated with planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies

Background:Previous studies have shown that planned home birth is associated with a decreased likelihood of intrapartum intervention with no difference in neonatal outcomes compared with planned hospital birth. The purpose of our study was to evaluate different birth settings by comparing neonatal mortality, morbidity and rates of birth interventions between planned home and planned hospital births in Ontario, Canada.Methods:We used a provincial database of all midwifery-booked pregnancies between 2006 and 2009 to compare women who planned home birth at the onset of labour to a matched cohort of women with low-risk pregnancies who had planned hospital births attended by midwives. We conducted subgroup analyses by parity. Our primary outcome was stillbirth, neonatal death (< 28 d) or serious morbidity (Apgar score < 4 at 5 min or resuscitation with positive pressure ventilation and cardiac compressions).Results:We compared 11 493 planned home births and 11 493 planned hospital births. The risk of our primary outcome did not differ significantly by planned place of birth (relative risk RR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval CI] 0.68–1.55). These findings held true for both nulliparous (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.62–1.73) and multiparous women (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.49–2.05). All intrapartum interventions were lower among planned home births.Interpretation:Compared with planned hospital birth, planned home birth attended by midwives in a jurisdiction where home birth is well-integrated into the health care system was not associated with a difference in serious adverse neonatal outcomes but was associated with fewer intrapartum interventions.In Ontario, Canada, the College of Midwives of Ontario has regulated midwifery since 1994, and increasing numbers of women with low obstetrical risk and their newborns receive care in a publicly funded, midwifery-led continuity of care model.¹ Midwives have admission and discharge privileges at their local hospitals and are able to consult or transfer care to other health care providers if required. In Ontario, midwives attend a small proportion of all births in the province (10%), and about 20% of the births they attend take place at home.² A comprehensive record is maintained for every woman and infant in a midwife’s care. Until 2009, this record was submitted to the provincial Ministry of Health and Long-term Care (MOHLTC) through the Ontario Midwifery Program to access reimbursement for care provided.In the last century, Western culture has come to view hospital birth as safer than home birth.³ Recently, however, the value of hospital birth for all women with low-risk pregnancies has come into question; it has been suggested that in the absence of benefit, a planned hospital birth for this population may increase the use of intrapartum interventions, including cesarean delivery.^4–7 Even though recent studies comparing planned home and hospital births have had moderate sample sizes, they are individually limited in their ability to report definitively on rare outcomes such as death. Owing to a lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to show that restricting a woman’s freedom to choose a place of birth prevents harm, the authors of a 2012 Cochrane review of planned hospital versus planned home births concluded that home birth services with collaborative medical backup should be established and offered to women with low-risk pregnancies in all jurisdictions.⁸ This conclusion, along with findings from the large English Birthplace Cohort Study,⁴ may be what prompted the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England to update its intrapartum care guidelines to recommend that, for women at low risk of birth-associated complications, home birth should be considered a generally safe option.⁹ With the paucity of information derived from RCTs,⁸ observational studies are essential to continue to inform and monitor maternal and infant outcomes for women at low obstetrical risk who plan home or hospital birth, and to continue to provide pregnant women with quality information about choice of birthplace.The primary purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the risk of stillbirth or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity among women at low obstetrical risk whose deliveries were attended by midwives and who had planned a home birth at the onset of labour, compared with women at low obstetrical risk who planned a hospital birth at the onset of labour. In addition, we also compared the incidence of maternal death and morbidity, birth interventions and breastfeeding between planned home births and planned hospital births.