首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Animal xenodiversity in Italian inland waters: distribution, modes of arrival, and pathways
Authors:Francesca Gherardi  Sandro Bertolino  Marco Bodon  Sandra Casellato  Simone Cianfanelli  Marco Ferraguti  Elisabetta Lori  Graziella Mura  Annamaria Nocita  Nicoletta Riccardi  Giampaolo Rossetti  Emilia Rota  Riccardo Scalera  Sergio Zerunian  Elena Tricarico
Institution:(1) Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e Genetica, Università di Firenze, Via Romana 17, Firenze, 50125, Italy;(2) Dipartimento di Valorizzazione e Protezione delle Risorse Agroforestali, Università di Torino, Grugliasco, Italy;(3) Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Università di Siena, Siena, Italy;(4) Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy;(5) Museo di Storia Naturale, Sezione di Zoologia “La Specola”, Università di Firenze, Firenze, Italy;(6) Dipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy;(7) Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e dell’Uomo, Università di Roma 1, Roma, Italy;(8) Istituto per lo Studio degli Ecosistemi, CNR, Verbania, Pallanza, Italy;(9) Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Università di Parma, Parma, Italy;(10) Via Torcegno, 49, Roma, Italy;(11) Laboratorio di Ittiologia delle Acque Dolci, Maenza, Italy
Abstract:The paper provides a list of the non-indigenous animal species occurring today in Italian inland waters. Xenodiversity was found to amount to 112 species (64 invertebrates and 48 vertebrates), which contribute for about 2% to the inland-water fauna in Italy. Northern and central regions are most affected, and Asia, North America, and the rest of Europe are the main donor continents. The large majority of non-indigenous species entered Italy as a direct or indirect effect of human intervention. A difference between invertebrates and vertebrates was found for their mode of arrival (unintentional for invertebrates and intentional for vertebrates). Accidental transport, in association with both fish (for aquaculture or stock enhancement) and crops, has been the main vector of invertebrate introductions, whereas vertebrates were mostly released for stocking purposes. Overall stock enhancement (47.92%) and culture (37.5%) prevailed over the other pathways. Seventeen and 7 species of our list are included among the 100 worst invasive species of Europe (DAISIE) and of the world (IUCN), respectively. For some (but not all) non-indigenous species recorded in Italy the multilevel impact exerted on the recipient communities and ecosystems is known, even if rarely quantified, but knowledge on their chronic impact is still missing. Additional research is needed to provide criteria for prioritizing intervention against well established invaders and identify which new potential invader should be targeted as “unwanted”.
Keywords:Inland waters  Italy  Mode of introduction  Non-indigenous species  Pathway  Vector  Xenodiversity
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号