Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either–or presence–absence |
| |
Authors: | Alberto Jimnez-Valverde Jorge M Lobo |
| |
Institution: | aDepartamento Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), c/ José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain |
| |
Abstract: | For many applications the continuous prediction afforded by species distribution modeling must be converted to a map of presence or absence, so a threshold probability indicative of species presence must be fixed. Because of the bias in probability outputs due to frequency of presences (prevalence), a fixed threshold value, such as 0.5, does not usually correspond to the threshold above which the species is more likely to be present. In this paper four threshold criteria are compared for a wide range of sample sizes and prevalences, modeling a virtual species in order to avoid the omnipresent error sources that the use of real species data implies. In general, sensitivity–specificity difference minimizer and sensitivity–specificity sum maximizer criteria produced the most accurate predictions. The widely-used 0.5 fixed threshold and Kappa-maximizer criteria are the worst ones in almost all situations. Nevertheless, whatever the criteria used, the threshold value chosen and the research goals that determined its choice must be stated. |
| |
Keywords: | Confusion matrix Habitat-suitability models Kappa statistic Logistic regression Sensitivity– specificity difference minimizer Sensitivity– specificity sum maximizer Threshold |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|