Simultaneous CO2- and 16O2/18O2-gas exchange and fluorescence measurements indicate differences in light energy dissipation between the wild type and the phytochrome-deficient aurea mutant of tomato during water stress

The CO₂-, H₂O- and ¹⁶O₂/¹⁸O₂ isotopic-gas exchange and the fluorescencequenching by attached leaves of the wild-type and of the phytochrome-deficienttomato aurea mutant was compared in relation to water stressand the photon fluence rate. The chlorophyll content of aurealeaves was reduced and the ultra-structure of the chloroplastswas altered. Nevertheless, the maximum rate of net CO₂ uptakein air by the yellow-green leaves of the aurea mutant was similarto that by the dark-green wild-type leaves. However, less O₂was produced by the leaves of the aurea mutant than by leavesof the wild-type. This result indicates a reduced rate of photosyntheticelectron flux in aurea mutant leaves. No difference in bothphotochemical and non-photochemical fluorescence quenching wasfound between wild-type and aurea mutant leaves. Water stresswas correlated with a reversible decrease in the rates of bothnet CO₂ uptake and transpiration by wild-type and aurea mutantleaves. The rate of gross ¹⁶O₂ evolution by both wild-type andaurea mutant leaves was fairly unaffected by water stress. Thisresult shows that in both wild-type and aurea leaves, the photochemicalprocesses are highly resistant to water stress. The rate ofgross ¹⁸O₂ uptake by wild-type leaves increased during waterstress when the photon fluence rate was high. Under the sameconditions, the rate of gross ¹⁸O₂ uptake by ^aurea mutant leavesremained unchanged. The physiological significane of this differencewith respect to the (presumed) importance of oxygen reductionin photoprotection is discussed. Key words: Water stress, gas exchange, fluorescence quenching, Lycopersicon esculentum, mutant (tomato, aurea), energy dissipation