Quantitative quality-assessment techniques to compare fractionation and depletion methods in SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry experiments

Motivation: Mass spectrometry (MS), such as the surface-enhancedlaser desorption and ionization time-of-flight (SELDI-TOF) MS,provides a potentially promising proteomic technology for biomarkerdiscovery. An important matter for such a technology to be usedroutinely is its reproducibility. It is of significant interestto develop quantitative measures to evaluate the quality andreliability of different experimental methods. Results: We compare the quality of SELDI-TOF MS data using unfractionated,fractionated plasma samples and abundant protein depletion methodsin terms of the numbers of detected peaks and reliability. Severalstatistical quality-control and quality-assessment techniquesare proposed, including the Graeco–Latin square designfor the sample allocation on a Protein chip, the use of thepairwise Pearson correlation coefficient as the similarity measurebetween the spectra in conjunction with multi-dimensional scaling(MDS) for graphically evaluating similarity of replicates andassessing outlier samples; and the use of the reliability ratiofor evaluating reproducibility. Our results show that the numberof peaks detected is similar among the three sample preparationtechnologies, and the use of the Sigma multi-removal kit doesnot improve peak detection. Fractionation of plasma samplesintroduces more experimental variability. The peaks detectedusing the unfractionated plasma samples have the highest reproducibilityas determined by the reliability ratio. Availability: Our algorithm for assessment of SELDI-TOF experimentquality is available at http://www.biostat.harvard.edu/~xlin Contact: harezlak{at}post.harvard.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are availableat Bioinformatics online. Associate Editor: Thomas Lengauer