Validation of the MESSi among adult workers and young students: General health and personality correlates |
| |
| Authors: | Juan F. Díaz-Morales Christoph Randler Arturo Arrona-Palacios Ana Adan |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Faculty of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spainjuanfcodiaz@psi.ucm.es;3. Department of Biology, Eberhard Karls Universit?t Tübigen, Tübingen, Germany;4. Department of Criminology, UAMR-A, Autonomous University of Tamaulipas, Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico;5. Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, School of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;6. Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain |
| |
| Abstract: | The aim of this study was to provide validity for the Spanish version of the Morningness–Eveningness-Stability Scale – improved (MESSi), a novel evolved assessment of circadian typology which considers the subjective phase and amplitude by morning affect (MA), eveningness (EV) and distinctness (DI; subjective amplitude) sub-scales. Convergence validity of the MESSi with the reduced Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ) and relationships with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and sensitivity to reward and punishment (SR and SP) were analyzed. Two different Spanish samples, young undergraduate students (n = 891, 18–30 years) and adult workers (n = 577, 31–65 years) participated in this study. Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) of MESSi displayed acceptable fit of a three-factors measurement model. Percentiles of the MA, EV and DI sub-scales were obtained for students and adults. The MESSi showed good convergence validity with the rMEQ scores, with a higher correlation coefficient between MA, EV and lower with DI sub-scales. In both, young students and adult workers, MA was negatively related with the GHQ-12 and SP, but the percentage of explained variance (6% and 3%) was lower than the positive correlations between DI, the GHQ-12 and SP (20% and 13%). Morning types presented higher MA and lower EV scores than the other two typologies in both students and adult workers, whereas only differences in DI were found among students (lowest in evening type). Candidates to psychological symptoms and mental disorders (“true cases”), with the clinical cut-off criteria of the GHQ-12, showed lower MA and higher DI in students, whereas only DI was higher for “true cases” among adults. These results supported that subjective amplitude is a factor related to, but also differentiated of, morningness–eveningness (preferred time for a certain activity). The measure of amplitude might be more important than circadian phase in health consequences. |
| |
| Keywords: | Circadian preference distinctness general health morningness–eveningness sensitivity to punishment sensitivity to reward subjective amplitude |
|
|
